Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Experts, who needs them? Judicial inconsistency in instruction, admission and interpretation of forensic expertise
Louise Shorter1, Rachelle Cobain1, Geir Madland1
1Inside Justice, Kingston upon Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Abstract:
Science is knowledge. Continuing study adds to that knowledge, hence science is in perpetual flux. The law courts too are in flux but change in legal opinion does not necessarily keep pace with that of scientific opinion and the appeal court's concern for finality may override the correction of injustice through progress in understanding. From its casework, the charity Inside Justice has identified failures in the instruction of experts pre-trial and inconsistencies in the admission and evaluation of expert evidence post-trial, illustrated here by half a dozen case studies.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences

