Online measurement of PM from residential wood heaters in a dilution tunnel

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) requires residential wood heaters (RWHs) to meet particulate matter (PM) emission limits in order to lower ambient concentrations and reduce public exposure. The current US EPA dilution tunnel PM measurement methods for RWHs were developed several decades ago and use manual filter samples to generate a single PM value for tests that can last more than 12 hours for stoves and 30 hours for central heating appliances. This approach results in averaging periods of high and low emissions together and provides limited data on emissions over the entire burn profile. Over the last decade, the U.S. ambient fine particulate monitoring network has transitioned to the routine use of online automated methods. However, stationary source measurement methods have not made this transition. There are no substantial technical issues in implementing real-time automated methods to measure PM for RWH emission certification purposes. The Thermo Scientific Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM™) has been widely used for ambient PM measurements. It is a true inertial mass measurement with high time resolution and sensitivity. This work compares measurements obtained using a Thermo 1400 or 1405 TEOM with ASTM E2515 manual filter samples, the current US EPA Federal Reference Method, for 172 test runs across a wide range of stoves and PM loading conditions. The TEOM measurements used the same filter media, similar filter face velocities, and filter temperatures as manual methods. PM measurements were well correlated (R² > 0.9), with TEOM values typically lower by 5% to 10%. TEOM data capture was high, with filter changes resulting in ~5 minutes of lost data, usually once or twice during a multi-hour test. We discuss differences between the two methods, such as post-sampling equilibration and measurement of PM on sample train surfaces (probe "catch"). We also provide examples of substantial non-water semi-volatile mass loss during sampling.Implications: Measurement methods for continuous PM and our understanding of their performance has dramatically improved over the last thirty years. Highly time-resolved measurements of PM from residential wood heating appliances in an appliance certification testing context provide additional insight into both appliance performance and the suitability of the test method to assess that performance. This continuous measurement approach offers new opportunities to replace traditional US regulatory PM sampling integrated manual source methods like ASTM E2515 or EPA Method 5G testing. For measurement of combustion products that can have a wide range of physical and chemical characteristics, the TEOM's actual mass measurement principle has advantages over the sensitivity of surrogate methods to different aerosols for use in a regulatory program. Although the TEOM is commonly used to measure ambient PM, it can readily be configured to meet the needs of continuous emission testing.