Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predictive value derived from likelihood ratios: a superior technic to interpret quantitative laboratory results.

D A Lacher

    American Journal of Clinical Pathology
    |May 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary

    Calculating the predictive value of a positive lab test result loses crucial information compared to using likelihood ratios. This occurs due to arbitrary critical values, impacting diagnostic accuracy for quantitative tests.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation markers and altered gene expression in archival specimens of ovarian epithelial tumors.

    Cancer detection and prevention·1997
    Same author

    An approach to student-to-faculty feedback in the basic sciences.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1994
    Same author

    The radiologic diagnosis of autopsy-proven ventilator-associated pneumonia.

    Chest·1992
    Same author

    Comparison of nonparametric recursive partitioning to parametric discriminant analyses in laboratory differentiation of hypercalcemia.

    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·1991
    Same author

    Application of multidimensional scaling in numerical taxonomy: analysis of isoenzyme types of Candida species.

    Annals of clinical and laboratory science·1991
    Same author

    Relationship between delta checks for selected chemistry tests.

    Clinical chemistry·1990

    Area of Science:

    • Medical diagnostics
    • Laboratory testing
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Quantitative laboratory tests provide continuous data.
    • Assessing the predictive value of test results is crucial for clinical decision-making.
    • Current methods may oversimplify quantitative data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the predictive value of quantitative test values derived from likelihood ratios versus binary positive/negative results.
    • To evaluate information loss when using arbitrary critical values for laboratory tests.
    • To investigate the utility of logistic regression in predicting likelihood ratios.

    Main Methods:

    • Computer simulation of laboratory data.
    • Calculation of predictive values using likelihood ratios and disease prevalence.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of logistic regression to model likelihood ratios.
  • Comparison of information content between quantitative and binary test result interpretations.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant information loss occurs when converting quantitative test values to binary (positive/negative) results.
    • Arbitrary critical value selection leads to this information deficit.
    • Likelihood ratio calculations retain more information about the test's predictive power.

    Conclusions:

    • Likelihood ratios offer a more informative approach to assessing the predictive value of quantitative laboratory tests.
    • Binary classification of quantitative tests can obscure important diagnostic information.
    • Methodologies preserving the quantitative nature of test results are preferred for accurate predictive value assessment.