Avoid or Embrace? Practice Effects in Alzheimer's Disease Prevention Trials
Andrew J Aschenbrenner1, Jason Hassenstab1, Guoqiao Wang1
1Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevention trials need careful consideration of practice effects. These effects, improvements from repeated testing, were larger in a clinical trial than in observational studies, impacting outcome measures.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Clinical Trials
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Slowing cognitive decline is a key outcome in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials.
- Cognitive endpoints are often selected based on observational studies.
- Practice effects, or improvements from repeated testing, can significantly impact trial results, especially in cognitively unimpaired participants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare practice effects in a clinical trial setting versus observational studies for Alzheimer's disease prevention.
- To understand how practice effects may differ between trial and observational study designs.
- To inform the selection and modeling of cognitive endpoints in AD prevention trials.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the DIAN-TU-001 clinical trial (TU) and the DIAN-Observational (OBS) study.
- Comparison of practice effects on key cognitive outcomes between asymptomatic mutation carriers in the TU and matched participants in the OBS study.
- Assessment of practice effects across the trial duration and consideration of alternate instrument forms.
Main Results:
- Asymptomatic mutation carriers in the TU demonstrated persistent practice effects throughout the trial.
- Practice-related improvements were significantly larger on certain cognitive tests in the TU compared to the OBS study.
- Observed differences suggest that practice effects may be underestimated in observational studies due to less frequent assessments and absence of drug expectancy effects.
Conclusions:
- Practice effects in Alzheimer's disease prevention trials may be underestimated by observational studies.
- Cognitive endpoint selection for AD prevention trials requires careful consideration of practice effects, potentially by using trial data with similar assessment frequencies.
- Strategies like using alternate instrument forms or directly modeling practice effects are crucial for accurate outcome interpretation in AD clinical trials.
More Related Videos
09:38Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
08:27Establishment of a Valuable Mimic of Alzheimer's Disease in Rat Animal Model by Intracerebroventricular Injection of Composited Amyloid Beta Protein
Published on: July 29, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
