Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
CACHE (Critical Assessment of Computational Hit-finding Experiments): A public-private partnership benchmarking
Suzanne Ackloo1, Rima Al-Awar2,3, Rommie E Amaro4,5
1Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
One aspirational goal of computational chemistry is to predict potent and drug-like binders for any protein, such that only those that bind are synthesized. In this Roadmap, we describe the launch of Critical Assessment of Computational Hit-finding Experiments (CACHE), a public benchmarking project to compare and improve small molecule hit-finding algorithms through cycles of prediction and experimental testing. Participants will predict small molecule binders for new and biologically relevant protein targets representing different prediction scenarios. Predicted compounds will be tested rigorously in an experimental hub, and all predicted binders as well as all experimental screening data, including the chemical structures of experimentally tested compounds, will be made publicly available, and not subject to any intellectual property restrictions. The ability of a range of computational approaches to find novel binders will be evaluated, compared, and openly published. CACHE will launch 3 new benchmarking exercises every year. The outcomes will be better prediction methods, new small molecule binders for target proteins of importance for fundamental biology or drug discovery, and a major technological step towards achieving the goal of Target 2035, a global initiative to identify pharmacological probes for all human proteins.
More Related Videos
09:08Integration of Bioinformatics Approaches and Experimental Validations to Understand the Role of Notch Signaling in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: January 12, 2020
06:19Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Screening to Obtain Crystal Hits for Protein Crystallography
Published on: March 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Patch Clamp
In this method, a glass micropipette containing electrolyte solution is tightly sealed against a small portion of the cell membrane. As a result, a patch of the cell...