Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Interactions Between Signaling Pathways

Interactions Between Signaling Pathways

Signaling cascades usually lack linearity. Multiple pathways interact and regulate one another, allowing cells to integrate and respond to diverse environmental stimuli.
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...

TGF - β Signaling Pathway

TGF - β Signaling Pathway

The TGF-β signaling pathway regulates cell growth, differentiation, adhesion, motility, and development. TGF-β ligands that induce TGF-β signaling are synthesized in their latent form. Several proteases or cell surface receptors such as integrins act upon the latent form, releasing the active ligand. There are three types of mammalian TGF-βs: (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3) that bind as homodimers or heterodimers to TGF-β receptors. The TGF-β receptors...

Calmodulin-dependent Signaling

Calmodulin-dependent Signaling

Calmodulin (CaM) is a calcium-binding protein in eukaryotes that controls various calcium-regulated cellular processes. It has four calcium-binding sites that bind calcium to form the calcium-calmodulin ( Ca2+-CaM) complex. GPCR stimulation increases the calcium levels in the cells that bind to CaM and induces a conformational change.
The Ca2+-CaM complex does not have enzymatic activity by itself. Instead, the complex binds downstream target proteins, including membrane proteins or enzymes,...

Cell Signaling in Plants

Cell Signaling in Plants

Plant cells communicate to coordinate their cycle of growth, flowering and fruiting, and activities in roots, shoots, and leaves in response to the changing environmental conditions. Plant signaling is distinct from animal signaling. Plants primarily utilize enzyme-linked receptors, whereas the largest class of cell-surface receptors in animals are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Unlike animals, receptor tyrosine kinases are rare in plants. Instead, plants have a diverse class of...

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...

Bacterial Signaling

Bacterial Signaling

Bacterial signaling can occur within bacteria (intracellular) or between bacteria (intercellular). At times, a group of bacteria behaves like a community. To achieve this, they engage in quorum sensing, the perception of higher cell density that causes changes in gene expression. Quorum sensing involves both extracellular and intracellular signaling. The signaling cascade starts with a molecule called an autoinducer (AI). Individual bacteria produce AIs that move out of the bacterial cell...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Liquid biopsy-based diagnostic evaluation of hypermethylated CpG sites for ovarian cancer diagnosis.

Molecular oncology·2026

Same author

Bedaquiline Resistance: A Looming Global Threat in Tuberculosis Management.

Current microbiology·2025

Same author

Inhibitors of Serine Acetyltransferase Induce Lethality in <i>Entamoeba histolytica</i> and <i>Leishmania donovani</i>.

ACS medicinal chemistry letters·2025

Same author

Antifungal therapeutic potential of Candida albicans Fun30: screening and validation of novel inhibitors against Candida albicans.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2025

Same author

Expanding the DNA Motif Lexicon of the Transcriptional Regulatory Code.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Navigating circulating tumour cells and tumour microemboli: Where we stand in bridging their molecular dynamics with clinical translation.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 5, 2025

CD Spectroscopy to Study DNA-Protein Interactions

CD Spectroscopy to Study DNA-Protein Interactions

Published on: February 10, 2022

On the Interaction Between SMARCAL1 and BRG1.

Deepa Bisht¹, Ketki Patne¹, Radhakrishnan Rakesh¹

¹Chromatin Remodeling Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, JNU, New Delhi, India.

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

|July 5, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

SMARCAL1 and BRG1 proteins interact to form complexes crucial for DNA damage repair. Mutations in these proteins disrupt complex formation, potentially causing Schimke Immuno-osseous Dysplasia (SIOD) and Coffin-Siris Syndrome (CSS4).

Keywords:

BRG1 CSS4 SIOD SMARCAL1 SMARCAL1-BRG1 interaction protein-protein interaction

More Related Videos

Photoactivated Localization Microscopy with Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation BiFC-PALM

Photoactivated Localization Microscopy with Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation BiFC-PALM

Published on: December 22, 2015

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes

Published on: January 12, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 5, 2025

CD Spectroscopy to Study DNA-Protein Interactions

CD Spectroscopy to Study DNA-Protein Interactions

Published on: February 10, 2022

Photoactivated Localization Microscopy with Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation BiFC-PALM

Photoactivated Localization Microscopy with Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation BiFC-PALM

Published on: December 22, 2015

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes

Published on: January 12, 2024

Area of Science:

Molecular Biology
Genetics
Biochemistry

Background:

SMARCAL1 and BRG1 are ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers involved in DNA damage response.
Mutations in SMARCAL1 cause SIOD; mutations in BRG1 are linked to CSS4.
These proteins co-regulate DNA repair genes like ATM and ATR.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the interaction between SMARCAL1 and BRG1.
To determine if this interaction is essential for DNA damage response.
To understand the molecular basis of SIOD and CSS4.

Main Methods:

Co-immunoprecipitation assays to detect protein-protein interactions.
ATPase activity assays to assess functional dependence.
Analysis of deletion constructs and disease-associated mutants.

Main Results:

SMARCAL1 and BRG1 form complexes, dependent on their ATPase activity.
The HARP domain of SMARCAL1 mediates binding to BRG1.
SIOD and CSS4 mutants exhibit impaired SMARCAL1-BRG1 complex formation.

Conclusions:

SMARCAL1 and BRG1 physically interact, forming functional complexes vital for DNA repair.
Disruption of this interaction by disease-specific mutations underlies SIOD and CSS4 pathophysiology.
Targeting this interaction could offer therapeutic strategies for these syndromes.