Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Identification of Dopamine D1-Alpha Receptor Within Rodent Nucleus Accumbens by an Innovative RNA In Situ Detection Technology
Published on: March 27, 2018
Dose-Dependent Regulation on Prefrontal Neuronal Working Memory by Dopamine D1 Agonists: Evidence of Receptor
Yang Yang1,2, Susan D Kocher1, Mechelle M Lewis1,2,3
1Department of Pharmacology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Abstract:
Low doses of dopamine D1 agonists improve working memory-related behavior, but high doses eliminate the improvement, thus yielding an 'inverted-U' dose-response curve. This dose-dependency also occurs at the single neuron level in the prefrontal cortex where the cellular basis of working memory is represented. Because signaling mechanisms are unclear, we examined this process at the neuron population level. Two D1 agonists (2-methyldihydrexidine and CY208,243) having different signaling bias were tested in rats performing a spatial working memory-related T-maze task. 2-Methyldihydrexidine is slightly bias toward D1-mediated β-arrestin-related signaling as it is a full agonist at adenylate cyclase and a super-agonist at β-arrestin recruitment, whereas CY208,243 is slightly bias toward D1-mediated cAMP signaling as it has relatively high intrinsic activity at adenylate cyclase, but is a partial agonist at β-arrestin recruitment. Both compounds had the expected inverted U dose-dependency in modulating prefrontal neuronal activities, albeit with important differences. Although CY208,243 was superior in improving the strength of neuronal outcome sensitivity to the working memory-related choice behavior in the T-maze, 2-methyldihydrexidine better reduced neuron-to-neuron variation. Interestingly, at the neuron population level, both drugs affected the percentage, uniformity, and ensemble strength of neuronal sensitivity in a complicated dose-dependent fashion, but the overall effect suggested higher efficiency and potency of 2-methyldihydrexidine compared to CY208,243. The differences between 2-methyldihydrexidine and CY208,243 may be related to their specific D1 signaling. These results suggest that D1-related dose-dependent regulation of working memory can be modified differentially by functionally selective ligands, theoretically increasing the balance between desired and undesired effects.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Synthesis
Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral...
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Release or Uptake
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Role of Neurotransmitters in Memory
Glutamate and Synaptic Plasticity
Glutamate, the brain's main excitatory neurotransmitter, is...

