Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

05:47
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
559
Quality Evaluation of Triples in Knowledge Graph by Incorporating Internal With External Consistency
Summary
This study introduces a novel method for evaluating knowledge quality (KQ) in multisource knowledge graphs (KGs). By integrating internal consistency (IC) with external consistency (EC), it effectively reduces errors caused by incorrect data.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Data Science
Background:
- Evaluating knowledge quality (KQ) in multisource knowledge graphs (KGs) is crucial for applications like knowledge fusion and construction.
- Existing external consistency (EC)-based methods rely on high-quality KGs or statistical analysis, which are often unavailable or compromised by incorrect data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust method for evaluating KQ in multisource KGs that mitigates the impact of incorrect knowledge.
- To enhance the accuracy of knowledge quality assessment by incorporating internal structural patterns.
Main Methods:
- Introduced internal consistency (IC) evaluation, assessing triple conformity to the KG's semantic patterns using KG embeddings and logic inference.
- Integrated IC with EC to identify and reduce the influence of erroneous triples.
- Validated the proposed method on multiple datasets.
Main Results:
- The integrated IC-EC approach significantly reduced incorrect knowledge evaluations.
- The method effectively improved the overall quality evaluation of triples in multisource KGs.
- Demonstrated superior performance in mitigating the interference of incorrect knowledge compared to traditional EC methods.
Conclusions:
- Combining internal and external consistency provides a more reliable approach to knowledge quality evaluation in multisource KGs.
- The proposed method offers a practical solution for improving the accuracy and robustness of knowledge graph quality assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
518
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
518
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.3K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.3K
Improving Translational Accuracy
2.7K
2.7K
Multiple Comparison Tests
4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
530
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
530

