Identification of cell type-specific correlations between ERK activity and cell viability upon treatment with ERK1/2

Timofey D Lebedev1, Elmira R Khabusheva1, Sofia R Mareeva2

  • 1Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Insights

Directly inhibiting ERK1/2 shows promise for cancer therapy, but understanding drug selectivity and toxicity is crucial. This study reveals varying ERK dependencies and reactivation patterns, guiding the development of more effective ERK inhibitors.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling is crucial for cancer cell survival.
  • Directly inhibiting extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) is a potential cancer treatment strategy.
  • The dynamics and selectivity of ERK1/2 inhibitors are less understood than those of BRAF or MEK inhibitors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between ERK inhibition and drug-induced toxicity across various cancer cell lines.
  • To evaluate the dynamics of ERK1/2 reactivation and drug resistance.
  • To identify selective and effective ERK1/2 inhibitors for cancer therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized reporter cell lines for ERK1/2 and downstream kinase ELK1 in lung cancer, colon cancer, neuroblastoma, and leukemia.
  • Examined five ERK inhibitors (SCH772984, ravoxertinib, LY3214996, ulixertinib, VX-11e) and one MEK inhibitor (PD0325901).
  • Assessed cell viability, ERK inhibition, and drug-induced toxicity.

Main Results:

  • Different cancer cell lines exhibited varying dependencies on ERK signaling.
  • SCH772984 and VX-11e showed excessive toxicity unrelated to ERK1/2 inhibition in certain cell lines.
  • PD0325901, LY3214996, and ulixertinib demonstrated propensity for ERK1/2 reactivation over time, with two distinct reactivation patterns observed.
  • Cancer cells resistant to MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901 due to ERK1/2 reactivation remained sensitive to ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib.

Conclusions:

  • Correlating ERK inhibition with drug-induced toxicity in diverse cell lines aids in identifying more selective and effective ERK1/2 inhibitors.
  • Understanding ERK reactivation mechanisms is vital for overcoming drug resistance in cancer treatment.
  • ERK inhibitors may offer therapeutic advantages over MEK inhibitors in specific resistant contexts.