Combining echo-derived haemodynamic phenotypes and myocardial strain for risk stratification of chronic heart failure
Frank Lloyd Dini1, Gabriele Pestelli2,3, Nicola Riccardo Pugliese4
1Cardiovascular Unit 1, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Insights
Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) can refine risk assessment in heart failure (HF) patients by integrating with hemodynamic profiles. Its prognostic value varies across HF phenotypes, offering the most insight in patients with normal stroke volume index.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Echocardiography categorizes heart failure (HF) patients by hemodynamic profiles.
- The role of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) in integrating these profiles for risk stratification remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if LV-GLS can enhance the risk stratification of chronic HF patients when combined with echocardiography-derived hemodynamic profiles.
- To assess the prognostic value of LV-GLS across different hemodynamic phenotypes.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated 351 chronic HF outpatients with LV ejection fraction <50% and LV-GLS.
- Classified patients into four hemodynamic phenotypes: normal output-normal filling pressure (NO-NP), normal output-high filling pressure (NO-HP), low output-no RV dysfunction (LO-NRVD), and low output-RV dysfunction (LO-RVD).
- Assessed right ventricular (RV) function using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and RV free-wall longitudinal strain. Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.
Main Results:
- Prevalence: NO-NP (38%), NO-HP (22%), LO-NRVD (30%), LO-RVD (10%).
- The hemodynamic model independently predicted outcomes, providing incremental prognostic information over LV ejection fraction.
- LV-GLS showed a prognostic continuum across phenotypes, with reduced hazard ratios from NO-NP to LO-RVD.
Conclusions:
- LV-GLS impairment progresses across the spectrum of hemodynamic phenotypes.
- The prognostic utility of LV-GLS is dependent on the HF patient subgroup.
- LV-GLS provided the greatest additional prognostic information in patients with normal stroke volume index (SVI).
Aims:
Echocardiography has shown to categorize heart failure (HF) patients according to haemodynamic profiles. Whether left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) could integrate echo-derived haemodynamic profiles to risk stratify chronic HF patients is still unknown.
Methods And Results:
Chronic HF outpatients with LV ejection fraction (LV-EF) <50% (n = 351) and LV-GLS assessment were evaluated and divided according to four haemodynamic phenotypes based on LV stroke volume index (SVI), LV filling pressure (LVFP), and right ventricular (RV) function: normal output-normal LVFP (NO-NP), normal output-high LVFP (NO-HP), low output-no RV dysfunction (LO-NRVD), and low output-RV dysfunction (LO-RVD). RV function was defined using the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and RV free-wall longitudinal strain. The median follow-up duration was 3.3 years. The combination of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. The prevalence of NO-NP, NO-HP, LO-NRVD, and LO-RVD were 38%, 22%, 30%, and 10%, respectively. The haemodynamic model independently predicted primary and secondary outcomes, with incremental prognostic information over LV-EF (all P-values <0.001 for C-statistics). When univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the prognostic stratification capability of LV-GLS in different haemodynamic subgroups, we observed a reduction in LV-GLS hazard ratios from the NO-NP to the LO-RVD for every endpoint.
Conclusion:
There was a continuum in LV-GLS impairment across the spectrum of haemodynamic phenotypes and its prognostic value resulted variable depending on the types of chronic HF patients. The highest prognostic information added by LV-GLS was in patients with normal SVI.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure V: Medical Management


