Highly Aggressive Surgery Benefits in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

We investigated whether highly aggressive surgery has survival and perioperative complication benefit in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

This retrospective study included 209 patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer who underwent aggressive surgery [surgical complexity score (SCS) ≥8] between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients were categorized into the SCS 8-12 (less aggressive surgery, 83 patients) and SCS ≥13 (highly aggressive surgery, 126 patients) groups. Survival outcomes and perioperative complications between the groups were compared. Patient suitability for primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) was based on the evaluation of performance status, tumor load, and ascites. If patients were suitable for NACT/IDS, the residual tumor margins were marked at the initial laparotomy. The previously marked lesions were removed during IDS, even in patients with macroscopic tumor resolution.

Prevalence rates of stage IV disease, poor performance status, presence of omental cake, peritoneal cancer index ≥15, and IDS performed were significantly higher in the highly aggressive surgery group than in the less aggressive surgery group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the groups (PFS, 32 and 31 months, respectively; p=0.622; OS, 99 and 75 months, respectively; p=0.390). The incidence of severe perioperative complications was not significantly different between the less aggressive group (4.8%) and the highly aggressive surgery group (6.4%) (p=0.767).

Highly aggressive surgery with appropriate selection regardless of the timing of cytoreduction benefits patients with advanced ovarian cancer.