Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy
Published on: June 2, 2018
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Better than Open? A Systematic Review and
Niccolo Petrucciani1, Anna Crovetto1, Francesca DE Felice2
1Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, St Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Background/Aim:
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after minimally invasive versus open procedures.
Materials And Methods:
Following the PRISMA statement, literature research was conducted focusing on papers comparing the incidence of POPF after open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) versus minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD).
Results:
Twenty-one papers were included in this meta-analysis, for a total of 4,448 patients. A total of 2,456 patients (55.2%) underwent OPD, while 1,992 (44.8%) underwent MIPD. Age, ASA score III patients, incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and duct diameter were significantly lower in the MIPD group. No statistically significant differences were found between the OPD and MIPD regarding the incidence of major complications (15.6% vs. 17.0%, respectively, p=0.55), mortality (3.7% vs. 2.4%, p=0.81), and POPF rate (14.3% vs. 12.9%, p=0.25).
Conclusion:
MIPD and OPD had comparable rates of postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, and POPF.
Insights
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) show similar rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). This meta-analysis found no significant difference in POPF, complications, or mortality between MIPD and OPD.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastroenterology
- Comparative Effectiveness Research
Background:
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is increasingly adopted.
- The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a key concern following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of POPF between minimally invasive and open pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures.
- Evaluate differences in major complications and mortality between surgical approaches.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
- Literature search focused on studies comparing open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) and MIPD regarding POPF incidence.
Main Results:
- Twenty-one studies with 4,448 patients (2,456 OPD, 1,992 MIPD) were analyzed.
- No statistically significant differences in POPF rates (14.3% vs. 12.9%, p=0.25) were observed.
- Major complications and mortality rates were comparable between OPD and MIPD groups.
Conclusions:
- MIPD and OPD demonstrate comparable outcomes regarding POPF.
- Both surgical approaches exhibit similar rates of postoperative complications and mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

