Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency
Published on: June 10, 2018
Evidence for close molecular proximity between reverting and undifferentiated cells
Souad Zreika1,2, Camille Fourneaux1, Elodie Vallin1
1Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, Université de Lyon, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, CNRS, UMR5239, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Chicken erythrocytic progenitors (T2EC) retain plasticity, reverting to an almost identical molecular state to undifferentiated cells after differentiation. This study reveals a previously undocumented plasticity during cell differentiation, driven by molecular network dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Epigenetics
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Waddington's epigenetic landscape model describes cell differentiation as a one-way process.
- Recent findings suggest committed cells retain plasticity, potentially reverting to a more pluripotent state.
- The molecular mechanisms underlying this cellular plasticity remain largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To molecularly characterize the reversion process of differentiating chicken erythrocytic progenitors (T2EC).
- To investigate the plasticity of committed cells using single-cell transcriptomic data.
- To understand the dynamic molecular network behavior during cell differentiation and reversion.
Main Methods:
- Chicken erythrocytic progenitors (T2EC) were cultured in self-renewal and differentiation media.
- Cells were analyzed at different time points: self-renewal (0H), 24-hour differentiation (24H), and 48-hour reversion (48H).
- Single-cell RT-qPCR and single-cell RNA sequencing were employed for transcriptomic analysis, followed by advanced statistical analysis.
Main Results:
- Dimensional reduction revealed a strong overlap between 0H (undifferentiated) and 48H reverting cells.
- Statistical analysis showed no significant molecular differences between 0H and 48H reverting cells.
- Sparse PLS analysis identified only 3 genes that discriminate between reverting and undifferentiated cells, indicating near-complete molecular recovery.
Conclusions:
- Reverting cells achieve a molecular state almost identical to their undifferentiated counterparts.
- This study demonstrates significant physiological and molecular plasticity in differentiating cells.
- The observed plasticity is likely a result of the dynamic nature of the underlying molecular regulatory network.
Related Concept Videos
Cellular Differentiation
A zygote is a...
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
Determination
Lineage Commitment
Role Of Notch Signalling In Intestinal Stem Cell Renewal
Direct cell-to-cell contact is needed for the activation of Notch signaling. The signal is initiated when a notch ligand binds to a receptor on an adjacent cell, also...
Introduction to Nuclear Reprogramming

