Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025
Laser Doppler: A Tool for Measuring Pancreatic Islet Microvascular Vasomotion In Vivo
Published on: March 8, 2018
Assessment of sublingual microcirculation for the screening of diabetic nephropathy
Qiang Li1, XiaoXiao Liu1, Mengxiao Jia1
1Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Objective:
To investigate the potential of employing sublingual microcirculation as an early noninvasive screening technique for diabetic nephropathy (DN).
Research Design And Methods:
We recruited 89 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 41 healthy subjects in this cross-sectional observational study. All participants underwent fluorescein fundus angiography, vibration perception testing, 10 g (Semmes-Weinstein) monofilament examination, nerve conduction velocity, and 24-h urine microalbumin determination. HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, blood lipid, and estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) were measured. Sublingual microcirculatory images were captured using side-stream dark-field (SDF) microcirculation microscopy, and total and perfused vascular density (TVD and PVD) were calculated.
Results:
The sublingual microcirculatory parameters denoting microvascular density and perfusion were negatively correlated with both fasting plasma glucose (TVD, r = - 0.316, P < 0.001; PVD, r = - 0.350, P < 0.001; PPV, r = - 0.279, P = 0.001) and HbA1c (TVD, r = - 0.367, P < 0.001; PVD, r = - 0.423, P < 0.001; PPV, r = - 0.399, P < 0.001). Diabetes patients already had a reduction in sublingual microcirculation compared with healthy control, and more severe reductions in TVD (7.07 ± 1.64 vs. 9.67 ± 1.94 mm/mm2, P < 0.001) and PVD (5.88 ± 1.82 vs. 8.64 ± 2.46 mm/mm2, P < 0.001) were found in those diabetes patients developed microvascular complications. Sublingual microcirculation impairment was accompanied with higher urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that TVD (area under the curve, AUC = 0.890 [0.836 0.944], P < 0.001) and PVD (AUC = 0.883 [0.826, 0.940], P < 0.001) could be indicators for DN screening. We derived a combined predictor index (CPI) considering both TVD and PVD for screening DN, and both the AUC (0.892, [0.838 0.945], P < 0.001) and cutoff point of 11.30 mm/mm2 showed great improvement (sensitivity: 95.5%, specificity: 67.4%).
Conclusions:
Diabetes patients experienced impaired sublingual microcirculation, which was closely correlated with UACR. Sublingual microcirculation monitoring could be used for the noninvasive early detection of DN.
