The Characteristics of White Matter Hyperintensities in Patients With Migraine

The presence of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in migraine is well-documented, but the location of WMH in patients with migraine is insufficiently researched. This study assessed WMH in patients with migraine using a modified version of the Scheltens visual rating scale, a semiquantitative scale for categorizing WMH in periventricular, lobar, basal ganglia, and infratentorial regions.

In total, 263 patients with migraine (31 men and232 women) enrolled in the American Registry for Migraine Research (ARMR) from Mayo Clinic Arizona and who had clinical brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in this study. Those with imaging evidence for gross anatomical abnormalities other than WMHs were excluded. A board-certified neuroradiologist identified WMHs on axial T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. WMHs were characterized via manual inspection and categorized according to the scale's criteria.

Results showed that 95 patients (36.1%, mean age: 41.8 years) had no WMHs on axial T2 and FLAIR imaging and 168 patients (63.9%, mean age: 51.4 year) had WMHs. Of those with WMHs, 94.1% (n = 158) had lobar hyperintensities (frontal: 148/158, 93.7%; parietal: 57/158, 36.1%; temporal: 35/158, 22.1%; and occipital: 9/158, 5.7%), 13/168, 7.7% had basal ganglia WMHs, 49/168, 29.1% had periventricular WMHs, and 17/168, 10.1% had infratentorial WMHs. In addition, 101/168 patients (60.1%) had bilateral WMHs and 67/168 (39.9%) had unilateral WMHs (34 right hemisphere/33 left hemisphere).

Among ARMR participants who were enrolled by Mayo Clinic Arizona and who had clinical brain MRIs, nearly two-thirds had WMHs. The WMHs were the most common in the frontal lobes. Describing the features of WMHs in those with migraine, and comparing them with WMHs attributable to other etiologies, might be useful for developing classifiers that differentiate between migraine-specific WMH and other causes of WMH.