Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban in Chinese Patients With Stable Cardiovascular Disease
Tianyu Feng1, Zhou Zheng1, Shang Gao1
1School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Insights
Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin is a cost-effective strategy for secondary prevention in stable cardiovascular disease patients in China. This combination therapy offers improved health outcomes at an acceptable cost compared to aspirin alone.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
Background:
- Stable cardiovascular diseases (CVD) require effective secondary prevention strategies.
- Evaluating the economic value of novel therapeutic combinations is crucial for healthcare resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for secondary prevention in Chinese patients with stable CVD.
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban alone against aspirin alone.
Main Methods:
- A Markov model was developed using TreeAge 2019 to evaluate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
- Transitional probabilities were sourced from the COMPASS trial; costs and utilities were derived from Chinese data.
- The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated, using a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$11,000.
Main Results:
- Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin yielded an ICER of US$7937.30 per QALY gained compared to aspirin alone.
- Rivaroxaban alone showed an ICER of US$15,045.78 per QALY gained versus aspirin alone.
- Both strategies were evaluated against the established willingness-to-pay threshold.
Conclusions:
- Low-dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin appears to be a cost-effective option for secondary prevention in stable cardiovascular disease patients in China.
- The findings support the adoption of this combination therapy within the Chinese healthcare system.
Abstract:
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for patients with stable cardiovascular diseases in the China. Methods: We used TreeAge 2019 to construct a Markov model to assess the direct healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years for three therapies, namely low-does rivaroxaban plus aspirin, rivaroxaban alone, and aspirin alone. Transitional probabilities were derived from the COMPASS trial, and the costs and utilities were obtained from the Chinese Health Care Statistical Yearbook and published studies. Use the Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to describe the results. The willingness-to-pay threshold is set at US$11,000 (China's 2020 Gross National Product per capita). Result: In patients with stable cardiovascular disease, the increased cost per quality-adjusted life year gained in the low-dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin group compared to the aspirin alone group was US$7937.30. The increased cost per quality-adjusted life year gained in the rivaroxaban alone group versus the aspirin alone group was US$15,045.78. Conclusion: A low-does rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy may be cost-effective in the secondary prevention of stable cardiovascular disease in patients.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

