Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Minimum surgical volume to ensure 5-year survival probability for six cancer sites in Japan
Sumiyo Okawa1,2, Takahiro Tabuchi1, Toshitaka Morishima1
1Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Insights
This study determined site-specific minimum surgical volumes for six cancer types to improve patient survival. Evidence-based volumes, varying by cancer site, can enhance cancer surgery quality.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Outcomes Research
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Japanese government designates specialized cancer care hospitals with a general annual surgery requirement.
- Current regulations lack site-specific minimum surgical volume requirements for cancer types.
- This study addresses the need for evidence-based, site-specific surgical volume standards.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the site-specific minimum annual surgical volume for six major cancer types.
- To establish a correlation between surgical volume and 5-year survival probability.
- To inform policy for improving cancer surgery quality in designated hospitals.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 64,402 patient surgeries across six cancer types (esophageal, stomach, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, breast) in Osaka, Japan (2007-2011).
- Hospitals categorized by average annual surgical volume per cancer type.
- Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and joinpoint regression used to estimate survival probability and identify inflection points.
Main Results:
- Estimated minimum surgical volumes per year: esophageal (35-39), stomach (20-25), colorectal (25-29), pancreatic (10-14), lung (10-14), and breast (25-29).
- Significant changes in 5-year survival probability observed with increasing surgical volumes, particularly before reaching the estimated minimums.
- Percentage changes in survival probability per five additional surgeries varied significantly by cancer site.
Conclusions:
- Site-specific minimum surgical volumes, derived from survival data, differ across cancer types.
- Some estimated volumes align with existing Japanese standards, while others suggest adjustments.
- Implementing these evidence-based minimum surgical volumes has the potential to enhance the quality and outcomes of cancer surgeries.
Background:
In Japan, the government designates hospitals specialized in cancer care, requiring them to perform 400 surgeries annually without requiring surgical volume per cancer site. This study aimed to estimate the site-specific minimum surgical volume per year based on its associations with 5-year survival probability.
Methods:
The data of 64,402 patients who had undergone surgery for six types of cancers (including esophageal, stomach, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, and breast cancers) at designated cancer care hospitals in Osaka between 2007 and 2011 were analyzed. The hospitals were categorized by the average annual surgical volume per cancer type (e.g., 0-4, 5-9, 10-14…). We estimated the adjusted 5-year survival probability per surgical volume category using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. Furthermore, we identified inflection points for the trend of adjusted survival probability per increase of five surgical volumes using the joinpoint regression model and considered them as the suggested minimum surgical volume.
Results:
The estimated minimum surgical volumes were 35-39, 20-25, 25-29, 10-14, 10-14, and 25-29 for esophageal, stomach, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, and breast cancers, respectively. The percentage change in the adjusted 5-year survival probability per increase of five surgical volumes before and after the suggested surgical volume were +2.23 and +0.39 for the esophagus, +9.68 and +0.34 for the stomach, +8.11 and +0.05 for the colorectum, +3.82 and +0.87 for the pancreas, +9.46 and +0.23 for the lung, and +1.27 and +0.03 for the breast.
Conclusions:
The suggested surgical volume based on the association with survival probability varies with cancer sites, some of which are close to the existing surgical volume standards used in Japan. These evidence-based minimum surgical volumes may help improve the quality of cancer surgeries.
More Related Videos
04:45Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer