Minimum surgical volume to ensure 5-year survival probability for six cancer sites in Japan

Sumiyo Okawa1,2, Takahiro Tabuchi1, Toshitaka Morishima1

  • 1Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.

Cancer Medicine
|July 7, 2022
PubMed

Insights

This study determined site-specific minimum surgical volumes for six cancer types to improve patient survival. Evidence-based volumes, varying by cancer site, can enhance cancer surgery quality.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Outcomes Research
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Japanese government designates specialized cancer care hospitals with a general annual surgery requirement.
  • Current regulations lack site-specific minimum surgical volume requirements for cancer types.
  • This study addresses the need for evidence-based, site-specific surgical volume standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate the site-specific minimum annual surgical volume for six major cancer types.
  • To establish a correlation between surgical volume and 5-year survival probability.
  • To inform policy for improving cancer surgery quality in designated hospitals.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 64,402 patient surgeries across six cancer types (esophageal, stomach, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, breast) in Osaka, Japan (2007-2011).
  • Hospitals categorized by average annual surgical volume per cancer type.
  • Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and joinpoint regression used to estimate survival probability and identify inflection points.

Main Results:

  • Estimated minimum surgical volumes per year: esophageal (35-39), stomach (20-25), colorectal (25-29), pancreatic (10-14), lung (10-14), and breast (25-29).
  • Significant changes in 5-year survival probability observed with increasing surgical volumes, particularly before reaching the estimated minimums.
  • Percentage changes in survival probability per five additional surgeries varied significantly by cancer site.

Conclusions:

  • Site-specific minimum surgical volumes, derived from survival data, differ across cancer types.
  • Some estimated volumes align with existing Japanese standards, while others suggest adjustments.
  • Implementing these evidence-based minimum surgical volumes has the potential to enhance the quality and outcomes of cancer surgeries.
Abstract