Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
Dynamic Docking of Macrocycles in Bound and Unbound Protein Structures with DynaDock
Maximilian Meixner1, Martin Zachmann1, Sebastian Metzler1
1TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University Munich, Am Staudengarten 2, Freising 85354, Germany.
Computational modeling of macrocycles is challenging due to their complex structures. This study introduces a flexible docking approach that accurately predicts bioactive conformations for macrocyclic compounds.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Molecular modeling
- Drug discovery
Background:
- Macrocyclic compounds possess unique conformational properties due to their constrained yet flexible ring structures.
- Accurate structural description is crucial for computational modeling, especially molecular docking, which often struggles with macrocycle flexibility.
- Existing docking tools frequently use rigid receptor models and pre-generated ligand conformers, limiting accuracy for flexible molecules.
Purpose of the Study:
- To optimize a molecular dynamics-based sampling and docking pipeline for accurate prediction of macrocyclic compounds.
- To develop a dihedral classification for detailed conformational analysis of macrocyclic rings.
- To enable fully flexible docking of macrocycles against both bound and unbound protein structures.
Main Methods:
- Developed a dihedral classification procedure for conformational analysis of macrocyclic rings.
- Generated structural ensembles of macrocycles through molecular dynamics-based sampling.
- Performed molecular docking using a fully flexible approach against bound and unbound protein structures.
Main Results:
- Including ring conformers close to the bound state in the initial ensemble improved docking success rates.
- The fully flexible approach achieved high and decent accuracy in predicting bioactive conformations for bound and unbound protein structures, respectively.
- Docking failures were primarily attributed to flexible substituents rather than the macrocyclic ring itself.
Conclusions:
- Incorporating full molecular flexibility in docking pipelines enhances the prediction accuracy of macrocyclic compound conformations.
- Optimized sampling and flexible docking strategies are essential for accurate computational studies of macrocycles.
- Further improvements for challenging cases involving flexible substituents can be achieved with explicit molecular dynamics simulations.
More Related Videos
10:33Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
Published on: October 26, 2015
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics
Various forces drive these interactions, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds, electrostatic interactions, and van der Waals forces. These bonds enable drugs to bind to specific sites on proteins,...
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Protein Dynamics in Living Cells
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescent-protein-based detection technique used to quantify protein movement rates within the cell. This method exposes a small portion of the cell to an intense laser beam. The laser beam causes permanent photobleaching of the fluorophore-tagged proteins in the exposed region. As the bleached...
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
Ligand Binding and Linkage