Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict
Mark Levine1, Richard Philpot1
1Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, UK mark.levine@lancaster.ac.uk r.philpot@lancaster.ac.ukhttps://www.lancaster.ac.uk/people-profiles/mark-levinehttps://www.lancaster.ac.uk/psychology/about-us/people/richard-philpot.
Abstract:
Pietraszewski misrepresents both the nature of behaviour in conflict and the ability of psychology to theorise the relational properties of group designation. At the behavioural level, he focusses exclusively on "attack," when consolation/care in conflict is equally present and important. At the theoretical level, he ignores existing psychological work on how group perception is shaped by the meta-contrast principle.
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
Robbers Cave
Cognitive Dissonance
Groupthink
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

