Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.5K

[The ground visual field assessment, using two methods, compared with Goldmann perimetry].

L Desbordes1, I Rebeyrotte-Boulègue1, I Travade1

  • 1Hôpital de jour baudin-mutualite limousine, 14, rue André Messager, 87000 Limoges, France.

Journal Francais D'Ophtalmologie
|July 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Descriptive analysis of the knowledge amongst French patients about neovascular age-related macular degeneration as a function of social vulnerability, health literacy and date of diagnosis.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2025
Same author

Towards a comprehensive framework for complex walking tasks: Characterization, behavioral adaptations, and clinical implications in ageing and neurological populations.

Ageing research reviews·2024
Same author

Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Using 360° Videos to Manage Well-Being in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2023
Same author

Effectiveness of home-based rehabilitation using active video games on quality of life, cognitive and motor functions in people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.

Disability and rehabilitation·2022
Same author

Equations for estimating the oxygen cost of walking in stroke patients: Systematic review.

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2021
Same author

Biopsychosocial determinants of visuospatial memory performance according to different spaces.

Neuroscience research·2020
Same journal

Real-time documentation of acute pre-retinal hemorrhage in central retinal vein occlusion.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2026
Same journal

Incidental detection of benign lobular inner nuclear layer proliferations (BLIPs) in a young adult.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2026
Same journal

Combined autonomic and cranial neuropathy following radiofrequency ablation for trigeminal neuralgia.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2026
Same journal

[Point-of-care biomarkers of ocular surface disease: Current approaches and future perspectives].

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2026
Same journal

Granulomatous reaction after hybrid hyaluronic acid-calcium hydroxyapatite filler injection in supratarsal hollow correction.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2026
Same journal

Sequential dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implants to treat macular edema in non-infectious uveitis.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Ground visual field assessment (GVFA) shows good reproducibility at 1m for visual field measurement. Automated GVFA is more reliable and preferred by patients, especially at closer distances.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Visual Rehabilitation
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Ground visual field assessment (GVFA) aids in evaluating scotoma size for locomotion and visual field (VF) restoration.
  • GVFA findings have not been previously compared with Goldmann testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the reproducibility of visual field measurements using Goldmann perimetry, manual GVFA, and automated GVFA.
  • To compare different conditions of GVFA testing.

Main Methods:

  • Ten patients with tunnel visual fields (≤25°) underwent binocular VF assessment.
  • Tests included Goldmann perimetry, manual GVFA (1m, 5m), and automated GVFA (1m, 5m).
  • Measurements were taken on the ground and at eye level.
Keywords:
Champ-visuelDisplacementDéficience visuelleDéplacementsGoldmannLocomotionOrientation and mobilityReproducibilityReproductibilitéRetinitis pigmentosaRétinite pigmentaireVisual fieldVisual impairment

More Related Videos

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.5K
Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation
10:46

Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation

Published on: September 18, 2012

18.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.5K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.5K
Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation
10:46

Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation

Published on: September 18, 2012

18.9K

Main Results:

  • Reproducibility was average to good for GVFA at 1m (ICC=0.685–0.866).
  • Reproducibility was poor between tests at 5m, except for manual and automated GVFA on the ground (ICC=0.888).
  • Automated GVFA demonstrated higher reliability and patient preference compared to manual GVFA.

Conclusions:

  • GVFA measurements show good reproducibility at 1m, with reduced reliability at 5m, likely due to execution challenges.
  • Automated GVFA is a more reliable method than manual GVFA and is preferred by patients.
  • GVFA offers a valuable tool for visual field assessment in rehabilitation settings.