Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Intravascular Delivery of Biologics to the Rat Kidney
Published on: September 1, 2016
Value of Literature Review to Inform Development and Use of Biologics in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Klervi Golhen1, Carolyn Winskill2, Cynthia Yeh2
1Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Insights
Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) significantly improve treatment responses in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. While effective, these therapies are associated with a slightly increased risk of infections and gastrointestinal adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology and Immunology
- Pediatric Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases (PiRDs)
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Background:
- Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a common pediatric rheumatic disease impacting quality of life and leading to chronic morbidity.
- Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have improved clinical outcomes in JIA.
- Understanding the efficacy and safety of these advanced therapies in JIA subgroups is critical for optimizing patient care.
Approach:
- Systematic review of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating bDMARDs or JAKi in JIA.
- Analysis of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric (Pedi) 30, 50, and 70 responses at 3 months.
- Comparison of treatment and control arms using risk ratios (RRs) and analysis of adverse events (AEs) and infections.
Key Points:
- Nine RCTs reported ACR Pedi responses, with all bDMARD and JAKi treatment arms showing improved responses over controls.
- Risk ratios for ACR Pedi 30, 50, and 70 responses ranged from 1.05-3.73, 1.20-7.90, and 1.19-8.73, respectively.
- A slightly higher risk of gastrointestinal AEs and infections was observed in treatment arms compared to placebo or methotrexate monotherapy.
Conclusions:
- bDMARDs and JAKi demonstrate superior treatment responses in JIA after 3 months, particularly for ACR Pedi 50 and 70.
- The benefits of efficacious disease treatment and damage prevention must be weighed against the increased susceptibility to infections.
- Further RCTs are needed to refine the development and utilization of biologics and JAK inhibitors in JIA management.
Background:
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases (PiRDs). Uncontrolled disease activity is associated with decreased quality of life and chronic morbidity. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have considerably improved clinical outcomes. For optimized patient care, understanding the efficacy-safety profile of biologics in subgroups of JIA is crucial. This systematic review based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to assess efficacy and safety data for bDMARDs and JAKi with various JIA subgroups after 3 months of treatment.
Methods:
Data for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric (Pedi) 30, 50, and/or 70 responses after 3 months of treatment were selected from RCTs investigating bDMARDs or JAKi in JIA according to predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Treatment and control arms were compared by calculating risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and proportions of overall, serious adverse events (AEs) and infections were analyzed. Forest plots were generated to summarize efficacy and safety endpoints across studies, JIA subgroups, and type of biologics.
Results:
Twenty-eight out of 41 PiRD RCTs investigated bDMARD or JAKi treatments in JIA. 9 parallel RCTs reported ACR Pedi 30, 50, and/or 70 responses 3 months after treatment initiation. All treatment arms showed improved ACR Pedi responses over controls. RRs ranged from 1.05 to 3.73 in ACR Pedi 30, from 1.20 to 7.90 in ACR Pedi 50, and from 1.19 to 8.73 in ACR Pedi 70. An enhanced effect for ACR Pedi 70 was observed with infliximab combined with methotrexate in PJIA vs. methotrexate monotherapy. A slightly higher risk of gastrointestinal AEs and infections was observed with treatment arms compared to placebo or methotrexate monotherapy.
Conclusion:
Investigated bDMARDs and JAKi showed superior treatment responses compared to controls after 3 months of treatment, which were more pronounced in ACR Pedi 50 and 70 than in ACR Pedi 30. Higher susceptibility to infections associated with bDMARDs or JAKi vs. control arms must be weighed against efficacious treatment of the underlying disease and prevention of disease-related damage. Additional RCTs are warranted to further inform development and utilization of biologics in JIA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Autoimmune Disorders
Concept and Mechanism of Autoimmune Diseases
The immune...

