Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

150
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
150
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

216
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
216
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.4K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.4K
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

1.8K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neurobiology of language in autism: a systematic review of pediatric studies.

Brain imaging and behavior·2026
Same author

A review on the validity of animal models for neuropsychiatric disorders: an exploration of anhedonia.

Behavioural pharmacology·2025
Same author

The role of the dopamine D1 receptor in anticipatory pleasure and social play.

Neuropharmacology·2024
Same author

Reduced access to reinforcement drives delay discounting during experienced delays.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2023
Same author

Dopamine D1 receptor and effort-based decision making in rats: The moderating effect of sex.

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry·2022
Same author

Preweaning environmental enrichment alters neonatal ultrasonic vocalisations in a rat model for prenatal infections.

Behavioural pharmacology·2022
Same journal

Behavioral and physiological changes during the estrous cycle of socially housed female guinea pigs.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Flexible time-series analysis: A dynamically aware method for inferring directed dependencies in behavioral data.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Effects of group size and landmarks on escape behavior of three fish species.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Vocal individuality in two sympatric seabird species: The role of developmental strategy, analytical approach and sample size.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

No evidence of sex-specific responses to chemosensory risk assessment cues in Harts rivulus.

Behavioural processes·2026
Same journal

Exploratory responses of rats to cage-mates and conspecifics from another cage in a habituation-dishabituation paradigm with multiple habituation stimuli.

Behavioural processes·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.5K

Choices about whether to wait: Changes in delay discounting without changes in time perception.

Kate M Witt1, Anne C Macaskill1

  • 1School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.

Behavioural Processes
|July 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Delay discounting, the reduced value of rewards over time, steepens with waiting. However, this effect is not linked to changes in how people perceive time, suggesting other factors influence decision-making.

Keywords:
Delay discountingImpulsivityTemporal bisection taskTime perceptionTimingWaiting

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

796
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

796
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Delay discounting describes the decrease in a reward's subjective value as its delay increases.
  • Discounting rates can vary based on whether waiting is involved or if the choice is about postponement.
  • The relationship between temporal perception and delay discounting, particularly during waiting, remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if changes in delay discounting during waiting tasks correlate with alterations in subjective time perception.
  • To explore the factors influencing steeper delay discounting observed over time within a session.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving participants completing delay discounting tasks.
  • Experiment 1 involved repeated completion of an experiential waiting task.
  • Experiment 2 included repeated delay discounting tasks alongside a temporal bisection task to measure time perception.

Main Results:

  • Participants exhibited steeper delay discounting in later trials of the waiting task in both experiments.
  • Subjective time perception, measured by the temporal bisection task, did not significantly change across the session.
  • Delay discounting rates were not correlated with subjective time perception.

Conclusions:

  • Changes in delay discounting during waiting are not explained by alterations in subjective time perception.
  • Contextual or reference effects may account for the observed increase in delay discounting over time.
  • Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind session-based changes in delay discounting.