Stereotype Content Model
Classification of Systems-I
Natural and Artificial Concepts
Classification of Systems-II
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
Modeling and Similitude
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia
Published on: May 1, 2021
Vyacheslav Kharchenko1, Herman Fesenko1, Oleg Illiashenko1
1Department of Computer Systems, Networks and Cybersecurity, National Aerospace University "KhAI", 17, Chkalov Str., 61070 Kharkiv, Ukraine.
This article proposes a structured framework to define and measure the quality of artificial intelligence systems. By creating a hierarchy of specific characteristics, the authors provide a standardized way to evaluate AI performance, platforms, and applications, helping developers ensure their systems meet necessary requirements during creation and implementation.
Area of Science:
Background:
Defining precise requirements for complex machine learning architectures remains a significant challenge for modern engineering teams. No prior work had resolved the ambiguity surrounding standardized metrics for evaluating these advanced computational frameworks. Prior research has shown that inconsistent terminology often hinders the effective verification of intelligent software during its lifecycle. That uncertainty drove the need for a unified taxonomy to guide development and modernization efforts. Existing literature frequently lacks a cohesive hierarchy that links platform capabilities with end-user application performance. This gap motivated the current investigation into structured quality models for intelligent technology. Scientists have long struggled to harmonize definitions across diverse sectors, leading to fragmented evaluation practices. The field requires a systematic approach to ensure that technical specifications align with practical deployment goals.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aims to develop and demonstrate the use of quality models for artificial intelligence, platforms, and systems based on the ordering of characteristics. This research addresses the difficulty of specifying requirements for intelligent software during its creation and modernization. The authors seek to harmonize definitions that currently complicate the verification of these complex technologies. By building a hierarchy of characteristics, the project intends to regulate the development of techniques and tools for standardization. The investigation focuses on providing a framework for the evaluation and provision of requirements during system implementation. The researchers substantiate the principles of model development and the sequence required for effective application. The work addresses the need for a structured approach to manage the diverse attributes of modern machine learning architectures. This effort provides a foundation for more consistent and reliable engineering practices within the field of automated technology.
Main Methods:
The review approach involves a systematic analysis of factors that complicate requirement specification for intelligent software. Investigators establish a hierarchy of 46 distinct characteristics to harmonize definitions across various platforms. The study design utilizes a characteristic-based framework to organize these metrics into logical dependencies. Researchers formulate definitions for each attribute to ensure consistency throughout the development lifecycle. The team constructs analytical, tabular, and graph representations to visualize the relationships between these identified quality factors. They derive basic models by selecting reduced sets of the most critical characteristics for streamlined application. The methodology includes testing these frameworks on practical examples, specifically unmanned aerial vehicle video navigation and medical diagnostic support. This structured process ensures that all evaluation criteria remain traceable to the core objectives of system modernization.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature confirm that a hierarchical arrangement of 46 specific characteristics effectively organizes the quality requirements for intelligent platforms. The researchers successfully demonstrate that these metrics can be presented in analytical, tabular, and graphical formats for improved clarity. The study provides evidence that reducing these hierarchies into basic models allows for efficient application in specialized domains. Examples confirm the utility of this approach for unmanned aerial vehicle video navigation systems. The findings also validate the framework for decision support tools used in diagnosing human diseases. The results indicate that harmonizing these definitions significantly simplifies the verification process for complex software. Data shows that the proposed ordering of characteristics provides a reliable basis for regulating development techniques. The analysis confirms that these models address the primary challenges associated with specifying requirements for modern automated technologies.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that a hierarchical structure for quality characteristics provides a robust foundation for standardizing intelligent system development. Synthesis and implications suggest that organizing these metrics into analytical and graphical formats improves clarity for engineering teams. The researchers indicate that applying these models to specific domains, such as navigation or medical diagnostics, validates their practical utility. This study demonstrates that reducing complex sets into basic models facilitates easier implementation for resource-constrained projects. The findings imply that harmonizing definitions across platforms reduces ambiguity during the verification phase of software creation. The authors conclude that their approach supports more consistent evaluation of intelligent tools throughout their operational lifespan. The evidence supports the claim that structured characteristic ordering assists in managing the complexity of modern machine learning implementations. These results highlight the potential for standardized quality frameworks to improve the reliability of diverse automated technologies.
The researchers propose a hierarchical framework that categorizes 46 distinct characteristics for AI and AI platforms. This structure allows developers to order dependencies, ensuring that quality requirements are consistently applied during the creation and implementation phases of intelligent software projects.
The study utilizes a characteristic-based approach, which involves defining, ordering, and harmonizing specific attributes into analytical, tabular, and graph formats. This method enables the creation of basic models with reduced sets of metrics for targeted applications.
A structured hierarchy is necessary to manage the complexity of 46 distinct characteristics. By establishing these relations, the authors ensure that developers can effectively regulate the development of techniques and tools for standardization across different platforms.
The researchers employ analytical, tabular, and graph data types to represent the dependencies between AI characteristics. These formats allow for the visualization of complex relationships, making it easier for engineers to verify system requirements during the modernization process.
The authors measure quality through the systematic ordering of 46 characteristics. This phenomenon allows for the differentiation between general AI models and specific applications, such as video navigation for unmanned aerial vehicles or medical decision support systems.
The researchers propose that their characteristic-based models facilitate the standardization of evaluation techniques. They claim this approach provides a consistent foundation for regulating requirements, which is vital for the successful implementation of intelligent systems in diverse operational environments.