Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

290
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
290
Natural and Artificial Concepts01:24

Natural and Artificial Concepts

255
In psychology, concepts can be divided into two categories: natural and artificial. Natural concepts are formed through direct or indirect experiences. For example, consider the concept of snow. If you live in a place with regular snowfall, such as Essex Junction, Vermont, you know snow through direct experiences. You’ve seen it fall, touched it, shoveled it, and played in it. You recognize its texture, appearance, and even its smell. In contrast, if you live on an island like Saint...
255
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

226
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
226
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

100
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
100
Modeling and Similitude01:12

Modeling and Similitude

325
Scaled modeling is a fundamental technique in engineering, enabling the study of large and complex systems by creating smaller, manageable replicas that recreate critical characteristics of the original. In hydrology and civil infrastructure, for example, scaled models of dams help analyze water flow, turbulence, and pressure. This method allows for accurate predictions of real-world behavior within a controlled environment, significantly reducing the cost and time involved in full-scale...
325

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Model and Method for Providing Resilience to Resource-Constrained AI-System.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Methods and Software Tools for Reliable Operation of Flying LiFi Networks in Destruction Conditions.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Security-Informed Safety Analysis of Autonomous Transport Systems Considering AI-Powered Cyberattacks and Protection.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Parameterization of the Stochastic Model for Evaluating Variable Small Data in the Shannon Entropy Basis.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

UAV and IoT-Based Systems for the Monitoring of Industrial Facilities Using Digital Twins: Methodology, Reliability Models, and Application.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Digital Image Representation by Atomic Functions: The Compression and Protection of Data for Edge Computing in IoT Systems.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia
08:58

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia

Published on: May 1, 2021

3.6K

Quality Models for Artificial Intelligence Systems: Characteristic-Based Approach, Development and Application.

Vyacheslav Kharchenko1, Herman Fesenko1, Oleg Illiashenko1

  • 1Department of Computer Systems, Networks and Cybersecurity, National Aerospace University "KhAI", 17, Chkalov Str., 61070 Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article proposes a structured framework to define and measure the quality of artificial intelligence systems. By creating a hierarchy of specific characteristics, the authors provide a standardized way to evaluate AI performance, platforms, and applications, helping developers ensure their systems meet necessary requirements during creation and implementation.

Keywords:
artificial intelligencecharacteristicqualityquality modelsoftware engineeringsystematic evaluationstandardization frameworkintelligent software

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

216
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

676

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia
08:58

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia

Published on: May 1, 2021

3.6K
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

216
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

676

Area of Science:

  • Software engineering and Artificial Intelligence systems quality assurance
  • Standardization frameworks for Artificial Intelligence systems development

Background:

Defining precise requirements for complex machine learning architectures remains a significant challenge for modern engineering teams. No prior work had resolved the ambiguity surrounding standardized metrics for evaluating these advanced computational frameworks. Prior research has shown that inconsistent terminology often hinders the effective verification of intelligent software during its lifecycle. That uncertainty drove the need for a unified taxonomy to guide development and modernization efforts. Existing literature frequently lacks a cohesive hierarchy that links platform capabilities with end-user application performance. This gap motivated the current investigation into structured quality models for intelligent technology. Scientists have long struggled to harmonize definitions across diverse sectors, leading to fragmented evaluation practices. The field requires a systematic approach to ensure that technical specifications align with practical deployment goals.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aims to develop and demonstrate the use of quality models for artificial intelligence, platforms, and systems based on the ordering of characteristics. This research addresses the difficulty of specifying requirements for intelligent software during its creation and modernization. The authors seek to harmonize definitions that currently complicate the verification of these complex technologies. By building a hierarchy of characteristics, the project intends to regulate the development of techniques and tools for standardization. The investigation focuses on providing a framework for the evaluation and provision of requirements during system implementation. The researchers substantiate the principles of model development and the sequence required for effective application. The work addresses the need for a structured approach to manage the diverse attributes of modern machine learning architectures. This effort provides a foundation for more consistent and reliable engineering practices within the field of automated technology.

Main Methods:

The review approach involves a systematic analysis of factors that complicate requirement specification for intelligent software. Investigators establish a hierarchy of 46 distinct characteristics to harmonize definitions across various platforms. The study design utilizes a characteristic-based framework to organize these metrics into logical dependencies. Researchers formulate definitions for each attribute to ensure consistency throughout the development lifecycle. The team constructs analytical, tabular, and graph representations to visualize the relationships between these identified quality factors. They derive basic models by selecting reduced sets of the most critical characteristics for streamlined application. The methodology includes testing these frameworks on practical examples, specifically unmanned aerial vehicle video navigation and medical diagnostic support. This structured process ensures that all evaluation criteria remain traceable to the core objectives of system modernization.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature confirm that a hierarchical arrangement of 46 specific characteristics effectively organizes the quality requirements for intelligent platforms. The researchers successfully demonstrate that these metrics can be presented in analytical, tabular, and graphical formats for improved clarity. The study provides evidence that reducing these hierarchies into basic models allows for efficient application in specialized domains. Examples confirm the utility of this approach for unmanned aerial vehicle video navigation systems. The findings also validate the framework for decision support tools used in diagnosing human diseases. The results indicate that harmonizing these definitions significantly simplifies the verification process for complex software. Data shows that the proposed ordering of characteristics provides a reliable basis for regulating development techniques. The analysis confirms that these models address the primary challenges associated with specifying requirements for modern automated technologies.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that a hierarchical structure for quality characteristics provides a robust foundation for standardizing intelligent system development. Synthesis and implications suggest that organizing these metrics into analytical and graphical formats improves clarity for engineering teams. The researchers indicate that applying these models to specific domains, such as navigation or medical diagnostics, validates their practical utility. This study demonstrates that reducing complex sets into basic models facilitates easier implementation for resource-constrained projects. The findings imply that harmonizing definitions across platforms reduces ambiguity during the verification phase of software creation. The authors conclude that their approach supports more consistent evaluation of intelligent tools throughout their operational lifespan. The evidence supports the claim that structured characteristic ordering assists in managing the complexity of modern machine learning implementations. These results highlight the potential for standardized quality frameworks to improve the reliability of diverse automated technologies.

The researchers propose a hierarchical framework that categorizes 46 distinct characteristics for AI and AI platforms. This structure allows developers to order dependencies, ensuring that quality requirements are consistently applied during the creation and implementation phases of intelligent software projects.

The study utilizes a characteristic-based approach, which involves defining, ordering, and harmonizing specific attributes into analytical, tabular, and graph formats. This method enables the creation of basic models with reduced sets of metrics for targeted applications.

A structured hierarchy is necessary to manage the complexity of 46 distinct characteristics. By establishing these relations, the authors ensure that developers can effectively regulate the development of techniques and tools for standardization across different platforms.

The researchers employ analytical, tabular, and graph data types to represent the dependencies between AI characteristics. These formats allow for the visualization of complex relationships, making it easier for engineers to verify system requirements during the modernization process.

The authors measure quality through the systematic ordering of 46 characteristics. This phenomenon allows for the differentiation between general AI models and specific applications, such as video navigation for unmanned aerial vehicles or medical decision support systems.

The researchers propose that their characteristic-based models facilitate the standardization of evaluation techniques. They claim this approach provides a consistent foundation for regulating requirements, which is vital for the successful implementation of intelligent systems in diverse operational environments.