Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Comparison of two cognitive screening measures in a longitudinal sample of youth at-risk for psychosis
Jenna R Kantor1, Ruben C Gur1, Monica E Calkins1
1Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, USA.
Background:
Validated screening tools are needed to detect subtle cognitive impairment in individuals at-risk for developing psychosis. Here, the utility of the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (CNB) were evaluated for detecting cognitive impairment in individuals with psychosis spectrum (PS) symptoms.
Methods:
Participants (n = 229; 54 % female) completed the MMSE and CNB at baseline and two-year follow-up. PS (n = 91) and typically developing (TD; n = 138) participants were enrolled at baseline based on the presence or absence of PS symptoms. After two years, 65 participants remained PS, 104 participants remained TD, 23 participants had Emergent (EP) subthreshold PS symptoms, and 37 participants were experiencing Other Psychopathology (OP).
Results:
Generally, those with PS had lower scores than TD on both the MMSE (p < 0.0001) and CNB (p < 0.0001). Additionally, OP participants performed lower on the MMSE than TD (p = 0.02). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated similar area under the curve (AUCs) for the two instruments (0.67); the MMSE showed higher specificity (0.71 vs. 0.62), while the CNB showed higher sensitivity (0.66 vs 0.52). Use of the MMSE and CNB in combination provided the highest diagnostic classification.
Conclusion:
The MMSE and CNB can be used to screen for cognitive impairment in PS. The MMSE is better at ruling out PS-related cognitive impairment while the CNB is better at ruling in PS-related cognitive impairment. Overall, our results indicate that both tests are useful in screening for cognitive impairment, particularly in combination, in a PS population.
