Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

In Vivo Multimodal Imaging and Analysis of Mouse Laser-Induced Choroidal Neovascularization Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
Multimodal imaging of experimental choroidal neovascularization
Ioanna Tsioti1, Xuan Liu1,2, Petra Schwarzer1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and Department of BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
Fluorescein angiography (FA) and multicolor (MC) imaging accurately measure choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in mice compared to histology. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) showed poor correlation and high variability for CNV assessment.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Animal Models
Background:
- Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a key cause of vision loss.
- Accurate in vivo measurement of CNV is crucial for research and treatment evaluation.
- Current imaging modalities require validation against histological standards.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare in vivo imaging techniques for measuring laser-induced CNV in mice.
- To validate fluorescein angiography (FA), multicolor (MC) imaging, and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) against ex vivo histology.
- To assess interobserver reliability for each imaging modality.
Main Methods:
- A murine laser-induced CNV model was used.
- CNV lesions were imaged using FA, MC, and OCTA at 14 days post-induction.
- Ex vivo isolectin GS-IB4 stained choroidal-retinal pigment epithelium whole mounts served as the gold standard.
- Measurements were compared using Spearman's rank correlation and interobserver reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Main Results:
- FA (early and late) and MC imaging showed good correlation with ex vivo histology (Spearman's r = 0.76 and 0.74, respectively).
- Interobserver reliability was high for FA (ICC = 0.97 and 0.96) and good for MC (ICC = 0.85).
- OCTA demonstrated poor correlation (Spearman's r = 0.06) and low interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.60) with histological measurements.
Conclusions:
- FA and MC imaging are reliable tools for in vivo CNV evaluation in rodent models.
- Caution is advised when using OCTA for CNV monitoring in small rodents due to measurement variability.
- Further comparative studies are recommended for OCTA in CNV assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

