Comparing the pharmacokinetics and organ/tissue distribution of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents using a rat model of sepsis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA
Published on: February 9, 2011
Shinji Kobuchi1, Naoya Kanda1, Taichi Okumi1
1Department of Pharmacokinetics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract:
Sepsis is a major cause of death, and sepsis-derived physiological changes complicate the understanding of drug distribution in organs/tissues, which determines the efficacy and toxicity of antimicrobial agents. In this study, we evaluated and compared the pharmacokinetics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment agents in sepsis with that of vancomycin, arbekacin, linezolid, and daptomycin.Rat models of sepsis were prepared using caecal ligation puncture. The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin, arbekacin, linezolid, and daptomycin were evaluated using their drug concentration profiles in plasma, kidneys, liver, lungs, skin, and muscles after intravenous administration in normal and septic rats.The kidney/plasma concentration ratio was higher in septic rats than in normal rats for vancomycin, arbekacin, and daptomycin but not for linezolid. The increase in the kidney/plasma concentration ratio for vancomycin was time-dependent, indicating an association between sepsis and stasis of vancomycin in the kidneys. In contrast, the distribution of linezolid from the blood to the organs/tissues in septic rats was comparable to that in normal rats.Sepsis-induced nephrotoxicity results in the stasis of vancomycin in the kidney, suggesting that this exacerbates proximal tubular epithelial cell injury. No dose modification of linezolid may be required for patients with sepsis.
More Related Videos
07:46Experimental Endocarditis Model of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA in Rat
Published on: June 4, 2012
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017