Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Direct Drug Delivery to Kidney via the Renal Artery
Published on: April 17, 2021
Is spinal anesthesia a safe alternative for retrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease in daily practice?
Andrea Benedetto Galosi1, Lucio Dell'Atti1, Daniele Castellani1
1Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Objectives:
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is commonly performed under general anesthesia (GA) because renal mobility during breathing may affect lithotripsy. However, spinal anesthesia (SA) is adopted in clinical practice due to clinical conditions that contraindicate GA. We aimed to compare results of RIRS for stones performed under GA compared to SA regarding stone-free rate (SFR) status and postoperative complications in a consecutive single-center series.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent RIRS for stones between 2017 and 2020.
Inclusion Criteria:
age ≥ 18 years, renal stone burden deemed suitable for RIRS with a stone diameter ≤ 20 mm.
Exclusion Criteria:
stones >20 mm, urinary tract infection, bilateral surgery, second-look procedures, unmodifiable bleeding diathesis, <5mm asymptomatic lower calyx stones. SFR was defined as no residual fragment >3 mm at 6-12 weeks follow-up. The choice of anesthesia was a shared decision between anesthesiologists and patient preference.
Results:
230 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 57.50±13.73 years. 33% of stones were located in the pelvis. 28.7% of patients had multiple stones. Mean cumulative stone diameter was 16.60±6.54 mm. 63% of patients underwent RIRS under SA. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative characteristics, except for comor-bidity, significantly higher in the GA group. Mean time of operating room occupation was longer in the GA group (81.58±35.37 minutes) than in the SA group (72.85±25.91 minutes,p=0.033). Length of stay was shorter in the SA group (mean 2.2±1.66 days vs 3.46±5.88 in GA,p=0.019). Logistic regression showed that multiple stones in the collecting system were associated with residual fragments (HR 0.386, 95%CI 0.151-0.991,p=0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in overall and high-grade complications, and in SFR between SA (75.9%) and GA groups (70.6%,p=0.317).
Conclusion:
SA does not affect SFR and postoperative complications in patients who underwent RIRS in daily practice.
More Related Videos
03:13Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
04:37Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management