Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025
Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases
Published on: July 28, 2013
Texture analysis in brain T2 and diffusion MRI differentiates histology-verified grey and white matter pathology
Zahra Hosseinpour1, Laura Jonkman2, Olayinka Oladosu3
1Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada.
Background:
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a co mplex disease of the central nervous system involving several types of brain pathology that are difficult to characterize using conventional imaging methods.
New Method:
We originated novel texture analysis and machine learning approaches for classifying MS pathology subtypes as compared with 2 common advanced MRI measures: magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and fractional anisotropy (FA). Texture analysis used an optimized grey level co-occurrence matrix method with histology-informed 7T T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) from 15 MS and 12 control brain specimens. DTI analysis took an innovative approach that assessed the texture across diffusion directions upsampled from 30 to 90. Tissue types included de- and re-myelinated lesions and normal-appearing areas in both grey and white matter, and diffusely abnormal white matter. Data analyses were stepwise, including: (1) group-wise classification using random forest algorithms based on all or individual imaging parameters; (2) parameter importance ranking; and (3) pairwise analysis using top-ranked features.
Results:
Texture analysis performed better than MTR and FA, with T2 texture performed the best. T2 texture measures ranked the highest in classifying most grey and white matter tissue types, including de- versus re-myelinated lesions and among grey matter lesion subtypes (accuracy=0.86-0.59; kappa=0.60-0.41). Diffusion texture best differentiated normal appearing and control white matter.
Comparison With Existing Methods:
There is no established method in imaging for differentiating MS pathology subtypes. In combined texture analysis and machine learning studies, there is also no direct evidence comparing conventional with advanced MRI measures for assessing MS pathology. Further, this study is unique in conducting innovative texture analysis with DTI following data-augmentation using robust methods.
Conclusions:
T2 and diffusion MRI texture analysis integrated with machine learning may be valuable approaches for characterizing MS pathology.
