Comparison of Early versus Late Below Knee Amputation After Trauma With Standardized Prosthetic Care

High energy, lower extremity trauma is associated with longstanding pain and functional limitations. The clinical decision to proceed with early amputation or limb salvage is often controversial. This study was designed to compare differences in complications, costs, and clinical outcomes of below knee amputation (BKA) performed early after injury or after attempted limb salvage in a hospital with standardized prosthetic care following amputation.

This is a retrospective comparative study of subjects who underwent BKA for a traumatic injury at a single level 1 trauma center and received standardized prosthetic care from a single manufacturer from 1999-2016 with minimum 2-year post-amputation follow up. Outcomes collected included demographics, surgical management, unplanned re-operations, and hospital and prosthetic cost data 2 years from time of injury.

Overall, 79 subjects met criteria. Early amputation (EA) was defined by median duration between injury and amputation (6 weeks) with 41 subjects in the EA group and 38 subjects in the late amputation (LA) group. Subjects in the EA group were more likely to have open fractures, high energy mechanism, and less likely to have medical comorbidities. Post-amputation infection was common in both groups (17/41 (42%) vs 17/38 (45%), p=0.77). Subjects undergoing EA were more likely to require unplanned post-amputation revision, 22/41 (54%) versus 10/38 (27%), p=0.017. Hospital costs and prosthetics/orthotics costs from the time of injury to two years following amputation were comparable, with mean hospital EA costs $136,044 versus LA costs $125,065, p=0.38. Mean prosthetics/orthotics costs of EA subjects were $33,252 versus LA costs $37,684, p=0.59.

Unplanned post-amputation revision surgeries were more common when BKA was performed early after trauma. Otherwise, outcomes and cost were comparable when amputation was performed early versus late. Level of Evidence: IV.