Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
Published on: April 19, 2024
Effect of pediatric ventilation weaning technique on work of breathing
Jefta van Dijk1, Alette A Koopman2, Limme B de Langen2
1Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Internal Postal Code CA 62, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.van.dijk01@umcg.nl.
Insights
Continuous spontaneous ventilation (CSV) and pressure-controlled assist/control (PC-A/C) modes showed similar patient effort during pediatric ventilator liberation. Reducing pressure support (PS) did not significantly increase patient effort, aiding in weaning strategies.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Respiratory physiology
- Mechanical ventilation
Background:
- Ventilator liberation is a critical challenge in managing pediatric respiratory failure.
- Limited evidence exists for pediatric ventilator liberation timing and weaning modes.
- Continuous spontaneous ventilation (CSV) is an alternative weaning approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare patient effort between pressure-controlled continuous mode ventilation (PC-A/C) and CSV in children.
- To assess the impact of decreasing pressure support (PS) on patient effort during weaning.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized, cross-over study in children < 5 years old.
- Measured inspiratory work of breathing (WOB), pressure-rate-product (PRP), and pressure-time-product (PTP).
- Utilized respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) to calculate phase angle.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in WOB, PRP, PTP, or phase angle between PC-A/C and CSV modes.
- Reducing PS led to a statistically significant but clinically negligible increase in patient effort.
- Thirty-six subjects with median ventilation time of 4.9 days were included.
Conclusions:
- Patient effort during pediatric ventilation liberation is comparable between CSV and PC-A/C modes.
- Decreasing PS levels does not result in clinically significant increases in patient effort.
- Findings support optimizing pediatric ventilation liberation strategies.
Background:
Ventilator liberation is one of the most challenging aspects in patients with respiratory failure. Most patients are weaned through a transition from full to partial respiratory support, whereas some advocate using a continuous spontaneous ventilation (CSV). However, there is little scientific evidence supporting the practice of pediatric ventilator liberation, including the timing of onset of and the approach to weaning mode. We sought to explore differences in patient effort between a pressure controlled continuous mode of ventilation (PC-CMV) [in this cohort PC assist/control (PC-A/C)] with a reduced ventilator rate and CSV, and to study changes in patient effort with decreasing PS.
Methods:
In this prospective physiology cross-over study, we randomized children < 5 years to first PC-A/C with a 25% reduction in ventilator rate, or CSV (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] + PS). Patients were then crossed over to the other arm. Patient effort was measured by calculating inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) using the Campbell diagram (WOBCampbell), and by pressure-rate-product (PRP) and pressure-time-product (PTP). Respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) was used to calculate the phase angle. Measurements were obtained at baseline, during PC-A/C and CPAP + PS, and during decreasing set PS (maximum -6 cmH2O).
Results:
Thirty-six subjects with a median age of 4.4 (IQR 1.5-11.9) months and median ventilation time of 4.9 (IQR 3.4-7.0) days were included. Nearly all patients (94.4%) were admitted with primary respiratory failure. WOBCampbell during baseline [0.67 (IQR 0.38-1.07) Joules/L] did not differ between CSV [0.49 (IQR 0.17-0.83) Joules/L] or PC-A/C [0.47 (IQR 0.17-1.15) Joules/L]. Neither PRP, PTP, ∆Pes nor phase angle was different between the two ventilator modes. Reducing pressure support resulted in a statistically significant increase in patient effort, albeit that these differences were clinically negligible.
Conclusions:
Patient effort during pediatric ventilation liberation was not increased when patients were in a CSV mode of ventilation compared to a ventilator mode with a ventilator back-up rate. Reducing the level of PS did not lead to clinically relevant increases in patient effort. These data may aid in a better approach to pediatric ventilation liberation. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT05254691. Registered 24 February 2022.
More Related Videos
08:34Investigation into Deep Breathing through Measurement of Ventilatory Parameters and Observation of Breathing Patterns
Published on: September 16, 2019
05:51Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Diaphragm Function and Patient Outcomes
Published on: November 3, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Pulmonary Cycle: Exhalation