Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

153
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
153
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

12.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.2K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

276
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
276
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.9K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.9K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

733
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
733

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Telomere-to-telomere assemblies of chromosome 10 reveal complex adaptive variation of 3-ketoacyl-CoA-synthases in <i>Populus trichocarpa</i> likely driven by Helitrons.

Forestry research·2026
Same author

Going against the grain: Investigating C4 photosynthesis in the wheat grain with spatial transcriptomics.

BMC plant biology·2026
Same author

Increasing value in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA) with precision health: a continuing landmark collaboration with the Department of Energy.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Canal Cholesteatoma Presentation and Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

Topical Imiquimod for Oral Cavity Leukoplakia and Dysplasia: A Scoping Review.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

DeCAF defines clinical fibroblast subtypes and multidimensional tumor-stroma crosstalk shaping prognosis and immunotherapy response.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K

Evaluating the performance of random forest and iterative random forest based methods when applied to gene expression

Angelica M Walker1, Ashley Cliff1, Jonathon Romero1

  • 1The Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education, University of Tennessee Knoxville, 821 Volunteer Blvd, Knoxville 37996, TN, USA.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
|July 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Iterative Random Forest-Leave One Out Prediction (iRF-LOOP) generates superior gene regulatory networks compared to GENIE3. This advancement improves gene network inference for biological analysis.

Keywords:
GENIE3, GEne Network Inference with Ensemble of treesGRN, Gene Regulatory NetworkGene expression networksIterative random forestNetwork biologyPEN, Predictive Expression NetworkRF, Random ForestRF-LOOP, Random Forest Leave One Out PredictionRandom forestiRF, iterative Random ForestiRF-LOOP, iterativeRandom Forest Leave One Out Prediction

More Related Videos

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples
07:30

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

12.2K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

187

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K
Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples
07:30

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

12.2K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

187

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Systems biology

Background:

  • Gene regulatory networks (GRN) and predictive expression networks (PEN) model gene relationships, aiding biological research.
  • Existing tools infer gene networks from expression data, with Random Forest-Leave One Out Prediction (RF-LOOP), known as GENIE3, being a prominent method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate that iterative Random Forest-Leave One Out Prediction (iRF-LOOP) produces higher quality gene networks than GENIE3.
  • To assess the performance of iRF-LOOP across diverse datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized iterative Random Forest (iRF) for variable selection and boosting within the RF-LOOP framework.
  • Applied iRF-LOOP and GENIE3 (RF-LOOP) to synthetic and empirical gene expression datasets.

Main Results:

  • iRF-LOOP demonstrated superior performance in generating gene networks compared to GENIE3.
  • Validation was performed using DREAM Challenges datasets and empirical data from *Arabidopsis thaliana* and *Populus trichocarpa*.

Conclusions:

  • Iterative Random Forest-Leave One Out Prediction (iRF-LOOP) offers improved accuracy for gene network inference.
  • The findings suggest iRF-LOOP as a valuable tool for enhancing downstream biological analyses.