Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

An Ex Vivo Tissue Culture Model for Fibrovascular Complications in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Published on: January 25, 2019
Aflibercept Monotherapy or Bevacizumab First for Diabetic Macular Edema
Chirag D Jhaveri1, Adam R Glassman1, Frederick L Ferris1
1From the Retina Consultants of Austin and the Austin Research Center for Retina - both in Austin, TX (C.D.J.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa (A.R.G., D.L., M.G.M., C.M.P., C.R.S.), the Florida Retina Institute, Orlando (M.A.C.), and Florida Retina Consultants, Lakeland (S.M.F.) - all in Florida; Ophthalmic Research Consultants, Waxhaw (F.L.F.), and Southeast Clinical Research Associates (J.B.A.) and Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Associates (D.B.), Charlotte - all in North Carolina; the Ophthalmology Group, Paducah, KY (C.W.B.); the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago (L.M.J.); the Southeast Retina Center, Augusta, GA (D.M.M.); Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (D.F.M.); and the Joslin Diabetes Center, Beetham Eye Institute, and the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston (J.K.S.).
In diabetic macular edema, aflibercept monotherapy showed similar visual outcomes to bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept. Both treatments for diabetic macular edema had comparable efficacy over two years.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Diseases
- Pharmacological Interventions
Background:
- Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss in diabetic patients.
- The optimal treatment strategy for DME, comparing aflibercept monotherapy to a step-therapy approach with bevacizumab followed by aflibercept, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the relative efficacy of aflibercept monotherapy versus a step-therapy approach using bevacizumab initially, with a switch to aflibercept if needed, for treating DME.
- To evaluate visual acuity, retinal thickness, and safety outcomes over a two-year period.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial involving 312 eyes of 270 adults with center-involved DME.
- Participants received either aflibercept monotherapy or bevacizumab, with a potential switch to aflibercept for suboptimal response.
- Primary outcome was mean change in visual acuity over 2 years; secondary outcomes included retinal thickness and safety.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mean visual acuity improvement between aflibercept monotherapy (15.0 letters) and bevacizumab-first (14.0 letters) over 2 years.
- Similar changes in visual acuity and central subfield thickness were observed in both groups at 2 years.
- Higher rates of serious adverse events and hospitalizations occurred in the aflibercept monotherapy group.
Conclusions:
- Aflibercept monotherapy and a step-therapy approach with bevacizumab followed by aflibercept demonstrate comparable visual outcomes for DME over two years.
- The bevacizumab-first strategy resulted in fewer serious adverse events and hospitalizations compared to aflibercept monotherapy.
More Related Videos
06:15Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
05:14Author Spotlight: Overcoming Anti-VEGF Resistance Through Advanced Vascular Morphology Assessment in Choroidal Neovascularization
Published on: August 11, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment