Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

11.8K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.8K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

15.2K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.2K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

28.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.4K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

7.3K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
7.3K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

7.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An expanded ecological trait dataset and checklist for subterranean spiders of Macaronesia and continental Europe.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Ten simple rules for making the supplement increase your paper's impact.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Nonlinear dynamics of fish beta diversity and the disproportionate influence of non-native species in cascade-dammed rivers.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same author

Stability in the face of global decline: a 20-year study of arthropods in an oceanic archipelago.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes already receiving SGLT2 inhibitors: a target trial emulation study using UK primary care data.

The Lancet. Primary care·2026
Same author

Integrating plot-based methods for monitoring biodiversity in island habitats under the scope of BIODIVERSA+ project BioMonI: Beetle monitoring in Pico and Terceira Islands.

Biodiversity data journal·2026
Same journal

The emerging field of wild animal welfare science.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Integrating nutritional mutualists into the evolution of defense.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Formation of three great Asian plateaus, climate change, and biodiversity: (Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 970-982; 2025).

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Digital twins as a tool for ecosystem research.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Constraint and convergence in the evolution of vertebrate sound production.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Is a comprehensive root economics space a chimera?

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Quantifying the internationalization and representativeness in research.

Pedro Cardoso1, Caroline Sayuri Fukushima1, Stefano Mammola2

  • 1Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|July 16, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New i-index and r-index metrics encourage international research collaboration and knowledge sharing. These indices aim to ensure equitable benefit-sharing between nations with varying developmental stages.

Keywords:
benefit sharingbiasbibliometricsdiversity in scienceequalityinclusion

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.0K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.0K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientometrics
  • Research Policy

Background:

  • Current author-level metrics inadequately capture interdisciplinary and international research collaboration.
  • Existing metrics do not quantify knowledge transfer between researchers, institutions, and countries.
  • There is a need for novel metrics that incentivize global research partnerships.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the i-index and r-index as new publication metrics.
  • To propose metrics that specifically incentivize cross-border collaboration between researchers and institutions.
  • To promote equitable benefit-sharing in international research endeavors, particularly between developed and developing nations.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptualization of the i-index and r-index based on collaboration and knowledge transfer principles.
  • Development of a framework for calculating these new indices.
  • Analysis of the potential impact of these indices on research collaboration patterns.

Main Results:

  • The proposed i-index and r-index offer a novel approach to evaluating research performance.
  • These indices are designed to reward and encourage international research collaborations.
  • Implementation of the i-index and r-index can foster greater equity in global research output.

Conclusions:

  • The i-index and r-index provide a more comprehensive measure of research impact by accounting for collaboration.
  • These metrics can serve as valuable tools for policymakers and research institutions aiming to foster international cooperation.
  • Adoption of the i-index and r-index can lead to more inclusive and globally beneficial scientific advancement.