Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinician decisions and computers.

G A Diamond, B H Pollock, J W Work

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    |June 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Computer decision aids can mitigate clinician bias by comparing individual experience with vast data, clarifying assumptions, and ensuring logical consistency. However, their widespread adoption and impact on healthcare quality and cost are yet to be determined.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Traumatic Lower Limb Amputations.

    The American surgeon·2025
    Same author

    A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum for the Prevention of GI aGvHD: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group (ACCL1633).

    Transplantation and cellular therapy·2025
    Same author

    Extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and survival from childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an international follow-up study.

    Blood cancer journal·2012
    Same author

    Is there clear and convincing evidence of cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone?

    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2011
    Same author

    Impact of recipient MELD score on resource utilization.

    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2006
    Same author

    Magnetic field exposure and long-term survival among children with leukaemia.

    British journal of cancer·2006
    Same journal

    Aortic Valve Replacement in Women of Reproductive Age.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Sudden Death in Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Patients: Insights From FINE-HEART.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Ultra-Thin Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients: The TUXEDO-2 Trial.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Reframing Cardiometabolic Risk and Frailty Through Sarcopenic Obesity.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    Imaging-Derived Sarcopenic Obesity and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Insights Into Heart Failure Risk and Muscle Biology.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Measure of a Leader: Lessons in Leadership From Eugene Braunwald.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Informatics
    • Clinical Decision Support Systems

    Background:

    • Clinician decision-making is susceptible to various cognitive biases and distorting influences.
    • Limited personal experience can lead to suboptimal clinical judgments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the potential of computer decision aids in improving clinical decision-making.
    • To examine how these aids can mitigate cognitive biases in healthcare.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of computer decision aids' mechanisms.
    • Discussion of the role of data comparison and logical consistency checks.

    Main Results:

    • Computer decision aids offer a broader perspective by comparing individual experience with extensive clinical data.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • They make implicit assumptions explicit and flag inconsistencies with data or logic.

    • Conclusions:

    • Computer decision aids show promise in enhancing clinical judgment and reducing errors.
    • Further development, validation, and ethical/legal considerations are needed for their effective integration into medical practice.
    • The ultimate impact on healthcare quality and cost remains to be evaluated.