Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
A protocol to gather, characterize and analyze incoming citations of retracted articles
Ivan Heibi1,2, Silvio Peroni1,2
1Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, Research Centre for Open Scholarly Metadata, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract:
In this article, we present a methodology which takes as input a collection of retracted articles, gathers the entities citing them, characterizes such entities according to multiple dimensions (disciplines, year of publication, sentiment, etc.), and applies a quantitative and qualitative analysis on the collected values. The methodology is composed of four phases: (1) identifying, retrieving, and extracting basic metadata of the entities which have cited a retracted article, (2) extracting and labeling additional features based on the textual content of the citing entities, (3) building a descriptive statistical summary based on the collected data, and finally (4) running a topic modeling analysis. The goal of the methodology is to generate data and visualizations that help understanding possible behaviors related to retraction cases. We present the methodology in a structured step-by-step form following its four phases, discuss its limits and possible workarounds, and list the planned future improvements.
Related Concept Videos
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Archival Research
The Replisome
Ethics in Research
Spare Receptors
Regulated Protein Degradation

