Related Experiment Videos
Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: the impact of task complexity
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|May 1, 1987
Summary
When faced with complex judgments, people use stereotypes to simplify decisions, favoring consistent information. This bias was observed in guilt judgments of Hispanic defendants, but not in simple trait judgments.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Stereotypes can influence judgment and memory.
- Information processing strategies vary based on judgment objectives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how stereotypes affect judgment and recall in a criminal trial context.
- To examine the role of judgment complexity in stereotype activation.
Main Methods:
- Participants read information about a defendant, either Hispanic or ethnically nondescript.
- Participants were instructed to judge guilt or aggressiveness.
- Participants made both guilt and aggressiveness judgments and recalled information.
Main Results:
- Under complex guilt judgment objectives, participants judged Hispanic defendants as more guilty and aggressive.
- Participants recalled more negative information about Hispanic defendants in the guilt judgment condition.
- Simple trait judgment objectives did not elicit significant bias in judgment or recall.
Conclusions:
- Stereotypes are employed to simplify complex judgments by organizing consistent information and neglecting inconsistent details.
- The type of judgment objective (complex vs. simple) significantly moderates the influence of stereotypes on information processing.