Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025
An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
Published on: February 17, 2018
Is There a Nerve-free Zone in Which a Subscapularis Split Can Safely be Performed? An Anatomical Study Using Embalmed
Martin Siwetz1, David Kieser2, Benjamin Ondruschka3
1Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Background:
The subscapularis muscle, which is part of the rotator cuff, is located anterior to the shoulder. In anterior approaches to the shoulder, its supplying nerves are at risk of iatrogenic injury, which may cause postoperative complications. It is unclear whether there is any nerve-free zone in which a subscapularis split can be performed without risking nerve damage.
Questions/Purposes:
In an anatomical study, we asked: (1) With the arm abducted 60° and externally rotated, what are the median and shortest distances between the entrance point of the subscapular nerves into subscapularis muscle and the myotendinous junction of this muscle? (2) What are those distances in other positions of the shoulder? (3) Did those measurements differ between specimen sexes or sides?
Methods:
In 84 shoulders of 66 embalmed anatomic specimens, the distance from the myotendinous junction of the subscapularis muscle to the entrance points of the subscapular nerves into the subscapularis muscle was measured using an inelastic thread and a millimeter gauge with the arm abducted 60° and rotated externally. In 16 of 84 shoulders, which were selected randomly, after taking the measurements with the arm abducted 60° and rotated externally, arm positions were changed and further measurements were taken with the arm abducted 60° and rotated neutrally, abducted 60° and rotated internally, and abducted 90° and rotated externally. The positions of the entrance points were described with statistical parameters and compared between different sides, sexes, and joint positions. Measurements were verified using eight fresh-frozen shoulders, showing no difference in distances compared with embalmed specimens and confirming reproducibility of measurements. Absolute distances were used to minimize possible distortion when using correlations and for straightforwardness and clinical applicability.
Results:
The median (range) distance was 43 mm (24 to 64) for the upper subscapular nerve and 38 mm (23 to 59) for the lower subscapular nerve with the arm rotated externally and abducted 60°. In the 16 subsamples, internal rotation decreased the distance to 34 mm (24 to 49) and 31 mm (15 to 43), respectively, and maximal external rotation and 90° of abduction increased it up to 49 mm (30 to 64) and 41 mm (27 to 56). Comparison of left and right sides yielded no difference. Comparison of sexes showed distances for the lower subscapular nerve of 36 mm (23 to 54) in females versus 39 mm (24 to 60) in males.
Conclusion:
In no specimen did the nerve come closer than 23 mm medial to the myotendinous junction with the arm rotated externally and abducted. Therefore, not exceeding a distance of 20 mm medial to the myotendinous junction with the arm rotated externally seems to provide sufficient protection from nerve injury during surgery.
Clinical Relevance:
Based on the described zone of 20 mm medial to the myotendinous junction, the risk of nerve injury in a subscapularis split approach can be minimized.
