Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Relationship Between Systemic Inflammation Index and No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation
Muhammet Cihat Çelik1, Orhan Karayiğit2, Can Ozkan3
1Department of Cardiology, 485536Hitit University Erol Olçok Education and Research Hospital, Corum, Turkey.
The systemic inflammation index (SII) may better predict the no-reflow phenomenon in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients compared to neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Higher SII, NLR, and PLR levels were associated with an increased risk of no-reflow.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarkers
- Inflammation
Background:
- The no-reflow phenomenon is a critical complication in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management.
- Systemic inflammation plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of STEMI and its complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between the systemic inflammation index (SII) and the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients.
- To compare the predictive capabilities of SII, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for no-reflow.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 785 STEMI patients was analyzed.
- No-reflow was defined using Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade.
- NLR, PLR, and SII levels were measured and compared between patients with and without no-reflow.
Main Results:
- Patients with no-reflow exhibited significantly higher NLR, PLR, and SII levels.
- NLR, PLR, and SII were independently associated with the presence of no-reflow.
- The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for SII was significantly higher than for NLR and PLR, indicating superior predictive capacity.
Conclusions:
- SII demonstrates a stronger predictive value for the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients than NLR and PLR.
- Systemic inflammation markers, particularly SII, are valuable in assessing the risk of no-reflow post-STEMI.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Myocarditis III: Medical Management