Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

446
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
446
Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck01:29

Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck

641
Hans and Sybil Eysenck developed a widely recognized theory of personality, which emphasizes the role of temperament and genetically based differences in shaping individual traits. Their theory posits that biological factors primarily determine personality and can be understood through two main dimensions: extroversion/introversion and neuroticism/stability.
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
641
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors01:24

Cattell's 16 Personality Factors

1.2K
Raymond Cattell's trait theory offers a structured framework for understanding personality by distinguishing between two critical traits: surface and source traits. Surface traits are observable patterns of behavior, such as indecisiveness, anxiety, and irrational fears. These traits are less stable, varying across situations and over time. This means that they are less helpful in understanding the deeper aspects of an individual's personality.
In contrast, source traits are the...
1.2K
Five-Factor Theory of Personality01:29

Five-Factor Theory of Personality

1.2K
The five-factor model, often called the Big Five personality traits, is widely accepted in psychology as a comprehensive framework for understanding personality. These five traits — Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism — are often remembered using the acronym OCEAN.
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
1.2K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

7.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.8K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Romano and De Dreu: Why violent extremism cannot be reduced to laboratory games.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Reply to Zadegan et al.: Spatial dependence is real, but not every correction travels well.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Intelligent Systems, Vulnerable Minds: A Framework for Radicalization to Violence in the Age of AI.

Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc·2026
Same author

'They're eating our pets!': When disgust and perceived cruelty combine to heighten prejudice.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

How malicious AI swarms can threaten democracy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Measuring extremist archetypes: Scale development and validation.

Milan Obaidi1,2, Sara W Skaar1, Simon Ozer3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Plos One
|July 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study identified five psychological archetypes of violent extremists, revealing distinct profiles related to violent intentions and personality traits. These findings offer a more nuanced understanding of extremist diversity across different groups.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
07:30

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study

Published on: August 18, 2020

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
07:30

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study

Published on: August 18, 2020

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Criminology

Background:

  • Previous research often overlooked the psychological diversity within violent extremist populations.
  • Understanding this heterogeneity is crucial for developing effective interventions and counter-extremism strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a scale measuring psychological archetypes of violent extremists.
  • To explore the diversity within extremist populations and its relation to violent intentions and ideologies.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative research and scale development (Extremist Archetypes Scale).
  • Quantitative validation across three studies (N = 932) with White majority and Muslim minority samples.
  • Analysis of sociopolitical ideologies, intergroup attitudes, and personality correlates.

Main Results:

  • Identification of five distinct extremist archetype dimensions: adventurer, fellow traveler, leader, drifter, and misfit.
  • Four archetypes were associated with extremist violent intentions, showing dissociation in ideologies and attitudes.
  • Archetype dimensions demonstrated distinct personality correlates and were replicated across diverse samples and demographic groups.

Conclusions:

  • The Extremist Archetypes Scale provides a validated tool for understanding psychological diversity among violent extremists.
  • These archetypes offer a nuanced framework for research, intervention, and policy development in counter-extremism efforts.
  • Measurement equivalence across demographic factors supports the scale's broad applicability.