Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.1K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.1K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

45.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
45.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.9K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.3K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.6K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.6K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

35.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vapor Tales: The Effects of Narrative Fear Appeal on Vaping Cessation Among American Young Adults.

Health communication·2026
Same author

Communities of Knowledge in Trouble.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023
Same author

Auditing the value of empirical audits.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Conspiracy Theory as Individual and Group Behavior: Observations from the Flat Earth International Conference.

Topics in cognitive science·2023
Same author

The influence of social norms varies with "others" groups: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination intentions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same author

Evidence from a statewide vaccination RCT shows the limits of nudges.

Nature·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Knowledge overconfidence is associated with anti-consensus views on controversial scientific issues.

Nicholas Light1, Philip M Fernbach2, Nathaniel Rabb3

  • 1School of Business, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.

Science Advances
|July 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Public opposition to scientific consensus, including vaccine rejection and climate change denial, is linked to low knowledge but high confidence. Understanding this gap is crucial for effective science communication.

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

558
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

558
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Science Communication
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Public opposition to scientific consensus poses significant risks, evident in vaccine hesitancy and resistance to climate change policies.
  • Understanding the relationship between public knowledge, perceived knowledge, and opposition to scientific consensus is critical for addressing societal challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interplay between opposition to scientific consensus, objective knowledge, and subjective knowledge across various scientific issues.
  • To examine these relationships in the context of climate change, vaccine acceptance, and COVID-19 mitigation measures.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of five studies examining public attitudes towards scientific consensus on seven critical issues.
  • Assessment of objective knowledge (what people know) and subjective knowledge (what people think they know).
  • Inclusion of data on attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines and mitigation strategies.

Main Results:

  • Individuals with the highest levels of opposition to scientific consensus demonstrated the lowest levels of objective knowledge.
  • Conversely, those most opposed exhibited the highest levels of subjective knowledge, believing they were more informed than they were.
  • This inverse relationship between objective and subjective knowledge was consistent across studied scientific issues and public health measures.

Conclusions:

  • The findings highlight a significant disconnect between perceived and actual knowledge among those opposing scientific consensus.
  • Implications suggest a need for tailored communication strategies for scientists, policymakers, and communicators to bridge this knowledge-belief gap.
  • Addressing overconfidence in misinformation is key to improving public understanding and acceptance of scientific consensus.