Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Attitudes01:54

Attitudes

29.3K
Attitude is our evaluation of a person, an idea, or an object. We have attitudes for many things ranging from products that we might pick up in the supermarket to people around the world to political policies. Typically, attitudes are favorable or unfavorable: positive or negative (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993). And, they have three components: an affective component (feelings), a behavioral component (the effect of the attitude on behavior), and a cognitive component (belief and knowledge;...
29.3K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.1K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.1K
Antisocial Personality Disorder01:24

Antisocial Personality Disorder

166
Antisocial personality disorder is a chronic mental health condition characterized by persistent patterns of disregard for the rights and well-being of others. Individuals with antisocial personality disorder exhibit behaviors that include deceitfulness, impulsivity, irresponsibility, aggression, and a profound lack of empathy. These traits often manifest early in life and persist into adulthood, leading to significant personal, social, and legal consequences.
Behavioral Characteristics and...
166
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

240.1K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
240.1K
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

248
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
248
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.2K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Actual Cleaning and Simulated Cleaning Attenuate Psychological and Physiological Effects of Stressful Events.

Social psychological and personality science·2025
Same author

What is unique about acceptance and correction of misinformation? Insights from work on attitudes, persuasion, and beyond.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Explanations of and interventions against affective polarization cannot afford to ignore the power of ingroup norm perception.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Quantifying the emergence of moral foundational lexicon in child language development.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Ambivalent attitudes promote support for extreme political actions.

Science advances·2024
Same author

Wipe it off: A meta-analytic review of the psychological consequences and antecedents of physical cleansing.

Psychological bulletin·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.7K

Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?

Aviva Philipp-Muller1, Spike W S Lee2,3, Richard E Petty1

  • 1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|July 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Antiscience attitudes stem from four key psychological principles: source credibility, social identity, value conflicts, and epistemic mismatch. Understanding these drivers is crucial for increasing public acceptance of science.

Keywords:
antiscienceattitudespoliticsscience communicationsocial identity

More Related Videos

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.0K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.7K
Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.0K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology of Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Science Communication

Background:

  • Antiscience views, from vaccination refusal to climate change denial, pose significant threats.
  • Understanding why individuals accept or reject scientific evidence is critical.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and specify core principles driving antiscience attitudes.
  • To provide evidence-based strategies for enhancing public acceptance of science.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesized decades of research on attitudes, persuasion, social influence, social identity, and information processing.
  • Applied emerging data and models on the psychology of antiscience.

Main Results:

  • Identified four core principles underlying antiscience attitudes: source credibility, social identity, value congruence, and epistemic fit.
  • Politics amplifies these principles, significantly influencing antiscience stances.

Conclusions:

  • Antiscience attitudes are complex, rooted in psychological and social factors.
  • Targeted, evidence-based strategies can counteract these attitudes and foster greater acceptance of science.