Point of care creatinine derived eGFR measurement in capillary blood for identifying patients at risk

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical reliability of eGFR values estimated with a creatinine measurement from a point of care (StatSensor®) compared with measured GFR (mGFR) by a gold standard method.

We prospectively included 113 patients undergoing renal function assessment. We compared eGFR using creatinine from capillary blood or venous blood measured by StatSensor® and measured GFR (mGFR) by Passing Bablok regression. Performance of eGFR was estimated by biais, precision and accuracy.

A total of 113 subjects were included. Median eGFR values were 59 (10-132), 52 (10-123) and 51 (10-131) ml/min/1.73 m² for enzymatic, capillary and venous measurements, respectively. There was no difference between P30 and P10 for the three eGFR values (p = 0.11 and p = 0.1 respectively). StatSensor® eGFR tended to be underestimated compared to mGFR. For CKD stage 4/5 patients, concordance was 79 and 84% for eGFR with capillary creatinine and venous creatinine respectively. For mGFR< 60 ml/min/1.73 m², concordance was 84 and 88% with capillary creatinine and venous creatinine respectively.

The use of a handheld blood creatinine monitoring system with eGFR calculation provides a good estimation of GFR and allow to identify patients at high risk of acute kidney injury.