Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
Focus group study of factors relevant to treatment decisions and experiences among patients with symptomatic
Matthew A Corriere1, Gloria Y Kim1, Mary E Byrnes1
1Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Background:
Clinical guidelines recommend shared decision-making for treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD), which requires understanding of patient perspectives and preferences. We conducted a focus group study of patients with symptomatic PAD to identify factors important and relevant to treatment choices, and to characterize aspects of the health care process that contribute to positive vs negative experiences apart from the specific treatment(s) received.
Methods:
Participants were recruited from an academic medical center over 2 years using a purposeful sampling approach based on a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic PAD (either claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI]) confirmed by the abnormal ankle or toe brachial index. Focus groups were led by a nonphysician moderator, consisted of 5 to 12 participants, and were conducted separately for patients with CLTI and claudication. Audio recordings converted to verbatim transcripts were used for qualitative analysis.
Results:
A total of 51 patients (26 with CLTI and 25 with claudication) were enrolled and participated in focus groups. Major themes identified related to treatment preferences and decisions included specific interventions under consideration, the chance of technical success versus failure, anticipated degree of symptom improvement, outcome durability, and risk. Major themes related to the process of care included decision-making input, provider communication and trust, the timeline from diagnosis to definitive treatment, and compartmentalized care (including different venues of care).
Conclusions:
The results provide insights into patient preferences, perspectives, and experiences related to PAD treatment. These observations can be used to inform patient-centered approaches to shared decision-making, communication, and assessment of PAD treatment outcomes.
More Related Videos
14:52Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests