Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
Published on: March 11, 2022
A step towards dynamic foot classification: Functional grouping using ankle joint frontal plane motion in running.
Oliver Chalmers1, Richard Page1, Ben Langley1
1Sport and Physical Activity, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Edge Hill University, Lancashire, UK.
This study identified two distinct dynamic foot types in runners based on ankle motion, challenging traditional static classifications. Dynamic assessments are more appropriate for understanding foot function during running.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Human Movement Analysis
Background:
- Static foot classification assumes structure dictates function, but its validity is debated due to weak associations with dynamic motion.
- Calls exist for dynamic assessments to classify feet based on functional movement, yet methods are underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate homogenous subgroups of ankle joint complex (AJC) frontal plane motion within a group of runners.
- To develop and validate a method for dynamic foot type classification based on running kinematics.
Main Methods:
- K-means clustering analysis of barefoot running AJC frontal plane motion in 42 healthy adults.
- Statistical parametric mapping to compare kinematic differences between identified clusters.
- Agreement analysis between novel dynamic foot types and the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6).
Main Results:
- Two distinct clusters emerged: Neutral Dynamic Foot Type (NeutralDFT) with less eversion, and Pronated Dynamic Foot Type (Pronated DynamicDFT) with more eversion.
- Significant differences (p < 0.001) in AJC eversion were found between clusters, with large effect sizes (g > 1).
- Low agreement (κ = 0.08) was observed between dynamic foot types and the FPI-6 static measure.
Conclusions:
- A novel protocol for classifying dynamic foot types based on AJC motion during running was demonstrated.
- Poor agreement between dynamic and static measures highlights their non-analogous nature.
- Static foot classification may not accurately reflect functional foot response during running; dynamic assessments are recommended.
More Related Videos
08:43Diagnosis of Musculus Gastrocnemius Tightness - Key Factors for the Clinical Examination
Published on: July 7, 2016
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Ankle Joint
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Muscles of the Leg that Move the Foot and Toes
Anterior Compartment
The anterior compartment includes muscles that contribute to the dorsiflexion of the foot. This compartment houses the tibialis anterior, extensor hallucis longus, and extensor digitorum longus muscles....
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula