Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
Published on: May 16, 2025
How Accurate Are Surgeons at Calculating Orbital Volumes?
James Jeong1, Andrew J Manhan2, Shelly Abramowicz3
1Resident, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Purpose:
Bilateral orbital volume (OV) symmetry is imperative for successful orbital reconstruction to prevent complications such as enophthalmos, diplopia, and orbital dystopia. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of surgeon-led in-house OV calculation for reconstructed orbits after orbital floor fracture.
Materials And Methods:
This is a retrospective cross-sectional observational study of maxillofacial computed tomography scans for patients undergone orbital fracture repair by Emory Oral and Maxillofacial service at Grady Memorial Hospital (Atlanta, Georgia) from 2018 to 2020.The primary predictor variable was OV calculation approach (outsourced vs surgeon-led in-house approach). The primary outcome variable was OV. Secondary variables were age, gender, and race. Interobserver reliability was calculated with a 2-way mixed-effects model, intraclass correlation coefficients, 95% confidence intervals, and P values. Differences between OV (in-house and outsourced) were calculated using student t-test. Statistical significance was determined at P < .05.
Results:
During the study period, 172 patients sustained orbital floor fracture. Of them, 49 patients (31 male, 18 females; 98 orbits) with the mean age of 41.3 years (range, 19 to 89 years) met inclusion criteria. Subjects with incomplete medical records and inadequate computed tomography scans were excluded from the study. The racial distribution in descending order was 87.8% African American, 8.2% Caucasian, 2% Hispanic, and 2% Asian. There was excellent inter-rater reliability for calculating uninjured OV (OV-U, P < .0001) and reconstructed OV (OV-R, P < .0001). The mean OV difference of outsourced approach was 0.8 cm3and for surgeon-led in-house approach was 0.07 cm3. There was no significant difference in OV difference between outsourced and in-house approach (P = .16).
Conclusions:
In conclusion, using open-source 3-dimensional imaging software is a reliable and a predictable method at calculating reconstructed OV in patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of orbital fractures. By having this software in our personal computers and laptops, one can easily calculate OVs in an efficient manner.
More Related Videos
04:48Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
13:12Partial Optic Nerve Transection in Rats: A Model Established with a New Operative Approach to Assess Secondary Degeneration of Retinal Ganglion Cells
Published on: October 15, 2017