Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Common Iliac Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Treated With Curative Radiation Therapy: N1 or M1a?
Pradnya Chopade1, Priyamvada Maitre1, Sam David1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC and Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Patients with common iliac (CI) node-positive (CI-M1a) or pelvic node-positive (cN1) prostate cancer have similar outcomes after curative whole pelvic radiation therapy (RT) and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Further prospective evaluation of these oligometastatic prostate cancer treatments is warranted.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Oncology
Background:
- Common iliac (CI) lymph nodes are classified as M1a (oligometastatic) in prostate cancer staging.
- The distinction in outcomes between pelvic node-positive (cN1) and CI node-positive (CI-M1a) prostate cancer after curative treatment remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the treatment outcomes of patients with cN1 versus CI-M1a prostate cancer.
- To evaluate the efficacy of radical whole pelvic radiation therapy (RT) combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in these patient groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of node-positive prostate cancer patients (cN1 or CI-M1a) from a prospectively maintained database.
- Staging predominantly utilized Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (Ga68-PSMA-PET/CT).
- All patients received long-term ADT and whole pelvic RT; restaging with Ga68-PSMA-PET/CT was performed at biochemical failure.
Main Results:
- Among 130 patients (87 cN1, 43 CI-M1a), biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) at 5 years was similar (77.4% vs 70.4%, P=.43).
- Distant metastasis-free survival (86.9% vs 79.4%, P=.23) and overall survival (92.6% vs 90.1%, P=.80) were also comparable between the cN1 and CI-M1a groups.
- Outcomes for CI-M1a patients did not differ based on proximal versus distal CI nodal location.
Conclusions:
- Oligometastatic CI-M1a and cN1 prostate cancer patients demonstrate similar outcomes when treated with curative whole pelvic RT and long-term ADT.
- Prospective studies are recommended to further evaluate treatment strategies for these patient populations.
More Related Videos
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
07:25A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018