Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review.
Sanne Peters1,2, Krithika Sukumar3, Sophie Blanchard4
1School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Sanne.peters@unimelb.edu.au.
This review found more studies are tailoring guideline implementation interventions. Most studies achieved impact, but further research is needed to confirm if planning processes consistently improve outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Knowledge Translation
Background:
- Clinical practice guidelines aim to support evidence-informed practice but often lack effective implementation strategies.
- A previous scoping review highlighted that guideline implementation interventions were not consistently selected or tailored.
- This study aimed to update the previous scoping review on guideline implementation interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and update the evidence on guideline implementation interventions.
- To identify common intervention characteristics and their reported impact.
- To assess the extent to which implementation planning processes are used.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a systematic search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane) for studies published from 2014 to January 2021.
- Screened studies in triplicate and extracted data in duplicate, focusing on study and intervention characteristics and reported impact.
- Included 118 studies evaluating guideline implementation interventions across 16 clinical topics.
Main Results:
- 21% of studies used theories/frameworks, 50% identified barriers, and 36% engaged stakeholders in intervention selection/tailoring.
- Common interventions included professional education (44%) and information systems/technology (41%); 75% used multi-faceted interventions.
- 82% of studies achieved impact, with higher impact rates observed in studies that pre-identified barriers (47.5%) or engaged stakeholders (52.4%).
Conclusions:
- More studies are now using planning processes to select and tailor interventions compared to previous reviews.
- While most studies achieved impact, the role of specific planning processes (frameworks, barrier identification, stakeholder engagement) in achieving impact requires further investigation.
- Future systematic reviews should explore the association between implementation planning strategies and intervention impact.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Current Trends in Nursing II

