Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

6.4K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
6.4K
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:27

Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

50
Introduction:Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, can include a specialized imaging technique of the urinary system known as Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU). This radiation-free technique uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images with the help of a computer. MRU is particularly effective for visualizing fluid-filled structures like the kidneys, ureters, and bladder.Applications of MRI in the Genitourinary SystemKidneys and Ureters: MRI detects tumors, cysts,...
50
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

429
Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
429

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain age gap as a diffusion MRI-based marker of traumatic brain injury-related brain changes and associated outcomes.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

Prediction modeling in transdiagnostic risk: results from the PROCAN study.

Brain imaging and behavior·2026
Same author

CytoCLIP: Learning Cytoarchitectural Characteristics in Developing Human Brain Using Contrastive Language Image Pre-Training.

Neuroinformatics·2026
Same author

AD-DAE: Alzheimer's Disease Progression Modeling with Unpaired Longitudinal MRI using Diffusion Auto-Encoders.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2026
Same author

Leveraging modality-guided pre-training for dual-prompt-driven multi-cancer PET-CT segmentation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

Towards robust foundation models for digital pathology.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 3, 2025

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T
10:22

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T

Published on: January 16, 2021

5.6K

Multi-Coil MRI Reconstruction Challenge-Assessing Brain MRI Reconstruction Models and Their Generalizability to

Youssef Beauferris1,2,3, Jonas Teuwen4,5,6, Dimitrios Karkalousos7

  • 1(AI)2 Lab, Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|July 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary

A new benchmark, the multi-coil MRI (MC-MRI) reconstruction challenge, addresses the need for evaluating deep learning brain MRI reconstruction. It assesses model generalizability across different coil configurations, crucial for clinical adoption.

Keywords:
benchmarkbrain imagingimage reconstructioninverse problemsmachine learningmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

More Related Videos

Multiple-mouse Neuroanatomical Magnetic Resonance Imaging
09:08

Multiple-mouse Neuroanatomical Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: February 27, 2011

15.9K
How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression
07:00

How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression

Published on: January 23, 2017

24.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 3, 2025

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T
10:22

MRM Microcoil Performance Calibration and Usage Demonstrated on Medicago truncatula Roots at 22 T

Published on: January 16, 2021

5.6K
Multiple-mouse Neuroanatomical Magnetic Resonance Imaging
09:08

Multiple-mouse Neuroanatomical Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: February 27, 2011

15.9K
How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression
07:00

How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression

Published on: January 23, 2017

24.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Deep learning accelerates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition.
  • Lack of benchmarks hinders assessment of high-resolution brain MRI reconstruction quality and robustness to data shifts.
  • Multi-coil MRI (MC-MRI) reconstruction is critical for advanced imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Establish a benchmark for evaluating deep learning-based brain MRI reconstruction.
  • Compare reconstruction models on high-resolution 3D T1-weighted MRI scans.
  • Assess model generalizability to data with varying receiver coil numbers.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a large dataset of high-resolution, 3D, T1-weighted MRI scans for the MC-MRI challenge.
  • Compared baseline and state-of-the-art brain MRI reconstruction models.
  • Evaluated model performance on generalizability to data acquired with different coil configurations.

Main Results:

  • Provided comparative information on current MRI reconstruction techniques.
  • Highlighted challenges in developing generalizable reconstruction models.
  • Demonstrated the utility of the MC-MRI benchmark for objective performance assessment.

Conclusions:

  • The MC-MRI challenge provides a crucial benchmark for brain MRI reconstruction.
  • Objective assessment is vital for advancing generalizable models toward clinical adoption.
  • Publicly available data and code facilitate future research and development.