Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training
Published on: January 20, 2019
Increasing physical activity in the vehicle with an interactive seating system in a male sample
Dario Lampe1,2, Barbara Deml2
1Mercedes-Benz AG, Boeblingen, Germany.
The interactive seating system (IASS) significantly increased heart rate and activated more muscles than the massage seating system (MS). The IASS also reduced discomfort, indicating a greater potential to mitigate health risks from prolonged vehicle sitting.
Area of Science:
- Automotive Ergonomics
- Occupational Health
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Prolonged static sitting in vehicles poses significant health risks, including metabolic and cardiovascular issues, and musculoskeletal pain.
- Current automotive seating systems, including advanced massage systems (MS), offer limited solutions for mitigating these risks.
- Novel interactive seating systems (IASS) aim to address these challenges through dynamic engagement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the health risk reduction potential of an interactive seating system (IASS) against a state-of-the-art massage seating system (MS).
- To evaluate the effects of IASS and MS on heart rate, muscle activation, and seating comfort/discomfort in a passenger scenario.
- To determine which system offers superior benefits for mitigating health risks associated with prolonged static sitting in vehicles.
Main Methods:
- A laboratory study involving 30 male subjects compared an interactive seating system (IASS) with a massage seating system (MS).
- Measurements included heart rate (ECG) and muscle activity (EMG) from six captured muscles.
- Subjective assessments of seating comfort and discomfort were also recorded.
Main Results:
- The interactive seating system (IASS) significantly elevated heart rate, unlike the massage seating system (MS).
- While the MS showed a tendency for lower back muscle activation, the IASS activated all six measured muscles.
- Subjects reported significantly less discomfort with the IASS compared to the MS.
Conclusions:
- The interactive seating system (IASS) demonstrates a substantially higher potential for reducing health risks associated with static sitting in vehicles compared to the massage seating system (MS).
- IASS's ability to increase heart rate, activate a broader range of muscles, and improve comfort makes it a more effective solution for sedentary risks in automotive environments.
More Related Videos
07:27Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty
Published on: October 6, 2016
08:40Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
Published on: November 11, 2022