Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
Biventricular versus Conduction System Pacing after Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Heart Failure Patients with
Maja Ivanovski1,2, Miha Mrak1, Anja Zupan Mežnar1
1Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Insights
Conduction system pacing (CSP), including His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), offers better outcomes than biventricular (BiV) pacing for heart failure patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation. CSP improved symptoms and heart function, with LBBP showing stable pacing potential.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities like His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) are emerging alternatives to biventricular (BiV) pacing.
- These techniques are considered for heart failure (HF) patients requiring a pace and ablate strategy, particularly those with refractory atrial fibrillation (AF).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of HF patients with refractory AF who received either BiV pacing or CSP (HBP or LBBP) following atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA).
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive HF patients undergoing AVNA was performed.
- Patients were divided into three groups: BiV pacing (13 patients), HBP (27 patients), and LBBP (10 patients).
- Clinical outcomes including New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed post-procedure.
Main Results:
- While baseline characteristics and acute success rates were similar, CSP modalities demonstrated superior outcomes.
- NYHA class improved significantly in HBP and LBBP groups but not in the BiV group.
- LVEF increased significantly in HBP and LBBP groups, whereas it remained unchanged in the BiV group.
Conclusions:
- Conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities provide superior symptomatic and echocardiographic improvements compared to BiV pacing after AVNA in HF patients.
- Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) may offer a more feasible pacing option due to its stable pacing parameters compared to HBP.
Abstract:
Conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities, including His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), are increasingly used as alternatives to biventricular (BiV) pacing in heart failure (HF) patients scheduled for pace and ablate strategy. The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes of HF patients with refractory AF who received either BiV pacing or CSP in conjunction with atrio-ventricular node ablation (AVNA). Fifty consecutive patients (male 48%, age 70 years (IQR 9), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 39% (IQR 12)) were retrospectively analysed. Thirteen patients (26%) received BiV pacing, 27 patients (54%) HBP and 10 patients (20%) LBBP. All groups had similar baseline characteristics and acute success rate. While New York Heart. Association (NYHA) class improved in both HBP (p < 0.001) and LBBP (p = 0.008), it did not improve in BiV group (p = 0.096). At follow-up, LVEF increased in HBP (form 39% (IQR 15) to 49% (IQR 16), p < 0.001) and LBBP (from 28% (IQR 13) to 40% (IQR 13), p = 0.041), but did not change in BiV group (p = 0.916). Conduction system pacing modalities showed superior symptomatic and echocardiographic improvement compared to BiV pacing after AVNA. With more stable pacing parameters, LBBP could present a more feasible pacing option compared to HBP.
More Related Videos
10:46Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Conduction System of the Heart
The pacemaker cells are located in two primary nodes: the sinoatrial (SA) node and the atrioventricular (AV) node. The SA node pacemaker cells can autonomously depolarize, triggering an action potential that leads to the...
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias